well, only if you have the skill for abrams, sure m1 is fine, but later version can be quite difficult, I’m a good grb player, but still suck at toptier
was it ground or air? It makes a huge difference
Oh nvm i missed the “ground” part.
My take is:
- Sweden. Not much tanks to grind + op tops
- Germany. Same as sweden but more tanks and less OP.
- US. Many tanks but Abrams are cool.
- Japan. Top tier apart of low tier is great but cardboard.
- France. Basically japan but slower reload and a bit more armor
- Britain. They are good tanks but not for everyone
- China. Have USSR MBTs but with mobility
- USSR. Some say they great, i belive they suck
- Israel. Merkavas are unique but broken, so not reliable.
- Italy. They havegreat 7.0-10.0 but their only great top tier is 2a7
Type 10 mobility still broken, Armour is also non existent besides a thin strip at the front of the hull.
2 Likes
Only looking for ground? Or air too?
1 Like
I only really play Francwe anymore and I don’t touch top tier even though I still need to spade my leclercs. It’s just not nearly as fun as 5.0 to 8.3 where imo the best the french tree has to offer is.
With the recent addition of the OPLOT and the M1A2T the autoloader changes for the ZTZ and VT4 i believe china is a real sleeper pick, decent- really good MBTs alongside really good light tanks (VT5 and ZBD, although granted they atm are really hard to pull off due to a certain russian autocannon monster), amazing CAS (helis at least) and CAP. The only downsides of China really is the LACK of a good fixed wing CAS platform.
Russia, the tanks are only okay aside from stuff like the BMPT. But their CAS just annihilates the enemy.
You can either cry about it or be a good boy and argue how STRV122 isnt best MBT
shiet, italy must have best MBTs now. Ariette`s so good, gosh.
1 Like
yes, and you can keep crying about it or describe how is it bad compared to 2a5 and 2a6 i played. For sure, when the idiot wants to make a a foolof himself he only goes for a person, not the take
Why do people always talk so much about vehicles they haven’t even tried?
1 Like
Even without any factual basis and even if they themselves haven’t played it, they still insist on making their incorrect statements.
Overall, ever Germany, Russia, Japan, Italy, France and Sweden are worthy of further development. However, from the recent data, Germany and Sweden have fallen far behind, while Russia and Japan are the top choices.
Japan… there empire is rising again.
1 Like
Because he’s literally just rage baiting. He ignores line ups and various other issues to troll folks on the forum.
1 Like
Playing the americans after german tanks feel like a step down. I’ve been playing the 2A4 and i’m close to unlocking the 2A6 and i’m amazed at the reliability. No more 50mm turret ring, no more bmps and 2s38 lolpenning me from the front. No more black horizontal ring because my engine got shot. It’s a very big quality of life and it will be felt, very much.
And their top tier jets are not really competitive anymore, Not when you have Rafale and SU30SM roaming around. Just to put it into perspective, imagine flying around in your F16C and someone shows up, shoots down all your missiles without bothering to notch, and then he still has more missiles than your full loadout.
You might want to reconsider playing USA.
1 Like
In my experience, the biggest problem with germany and sweden top-tier is the LDIRCM Helis, which completely negate the entire ground line-up. Like for real, the best thing you can do when the enemy starts spawning these things is to just leave and cope.
This is also the problem. But the fact is that Germany and Sweden indeed do not have better helicopters (although Japan should not have IR shield and Su-30 either, but this completely depends on how Gaijin thinks). But it is certain that in reality, Germany and Sweden have better Leopard 2s. At least the 122 will have DM53. The rear hemisphere shooting of the Leopard 2 can be achieved by turning off the stabilizer. The firing rate of the Leopard 2 can also be faster
And In reality, heliDIRCM is not as effective as it is in the game. When DIRCMheli was awarded to six countries, four of them received nothing and thus became the disadvantaged party. This is unreasonable. If the gaijin did not want to add DIRCM for them, they could have strengthened these four countries by enhancing SAM instead. But the gaijin did nothing.
1 Like