Because how are you supposed to adapt to a piece of equipment that you have no counter against?
But it’s still mixed lol, there is no NATO side. russia is just as likely to play with Germany as they are with the US
It’s not. Because both are realistic.
„They are performing worse, because they are dealing with stronger equipment than before that they can’t counter“ is not illogical in the slightest
This has happened before, and more than once.
Nope. It’s only because teammate search rules.
All main nations have ± same skill level because same players on both side.
There’s only one thing that defines winrate – teammate nation.
The most funny thing is that russian bias players don’t play any better than US, because literally the only thing USSR beginners can do is press a Kh-38 launch button).
uhm… how did ussr adapt to being bonked with AGM65s? Or how did they adapt to ITO90 and stuff when they had no Kh38s?
idk. Somehow? Skillfull?
but much more likely to play against both , siding with minor nations maybe
uuuugh they may or may not both be, based on what you decide is real. Real abrams reloading speed considered by the govt is it having 6 seconds of reload if i remember correctly, but the videos show some reload with 3 seconds. Which is real? Which should be made balanced? And in comparison, why if the balance needs it, cant the autoloader be balanced same way?
Ah but it misses the “Adaptation” part. USSR did reciveve Pantsir to counter the AGM65 spam within which time, 2 years? What should they have done for the rest of the time?
Or, or, the A-4E with Walleyes exists for a huge time, but only last year USSR got some SPAA to counter it - the Shilka IGLA. What were they supposed to do before?
Nah, they adapted. Adapted to A-4E killing them most of the games, adapted to IRIS-T spamming on their fields. And only then recieved a thing that with that experience made them “untouchable”. And yet, the Germany got IRIS to counter the Kh38. They will get the LMUR counter or alternative in some time. But they fail to adapt even for lesser evils
surely
Widen please?
“USSR adapt”? USSR players haven’t adapted. They were literally given SPAA, that many times more powerful than the others.
Same thing. They were given Kh-38.
Play like the other nations.
In my opinion theres no “best nation”, i just suggest you to try different types of tanks (grind different nations) and see which one works for you. I personally started with USSR when the premium bias was 2s38 and turms-t, i had a negative kd and overall was a bad experience for me. Then i swapped a month ago to sweden, been doing great since i really enjoy some mobility, but i also like having armor.
So my take is, try to understand what type of player you are, do you like sniping? Do you like brawling? Do you like lights?
If you need to choose one, i’d choose the most “diverse”, so you can try different gameplays and see how you do.
Sweden, i think, is the best one FOR ME becouse of my playstyle, 1st spawn is usually armor and on the 2nd/3rd spawn i like to roam around since there arent that much enemies left (light tank).
Having no helis is bad but im fine with it.
To answer your question, i think you could even go with China, since for me its just russia with more mobility, and you can also try the M1A2T and if u like it, US can be your 2nd nation or smth.
If you want cas, im no expert on it since, except for kh38 (russia and japan), every nation has decent cas.
in literal YEARS after huh?
Well then good luck germany, wait till you get your own Kh38s xD
in more than a year. But the winrate got back on regular track within month. How so?
so then, why germany cant play like italy now? xD
Dont play China
By getting new equipment lol
Citation needed
Both.
The one that gaijin deems the balanced value
No, because they have real, static values.
Because they literally don’t have the tools. Adapting to the SLM is easy when you have 38MTs and MLs. Adjusting to all LDIRCM helis (not just mi28nm) is impossible if all you have are flarakrad and an ir spaa.
USSR players in most cases can’t win even with Kh-38 if they’re playing versus USA + Germany + Swedish (NATO in full assembly).
U’re seriously thinking that main reason of USSR winrate was a Kh-38?)
Have you seriously equated all the German players?
Not for most USSR mainers).
It cant be both if we use one single basic value igame. Devs decide which is “balanced” and “realistic” at the same time with those, but then fail to do the same with autoloaders.
They are as static as loader Joe that punches the 20th shot in the breech. Autoloaders “realistically” fail to keep the speed static, especially rotary ones used on USSR macines
basically what happened with Shilka being only option of USSR against helicopters. And then its suddenly OP STRELA!!! when they got tools. But its “noooo gib tools” when germany doesnt have ones eh?
Exactly. Because even if the air is good, loosing ground is basically 100% loose in the game, and the Germany + US + Sweden is one hell OP combo of best ground forces
Depends on which period we`re about?
only to same extent you equate USSR players
Yes it can be both. One is based on a mechanical value, the other on varying human input. I really don’t know why this is such a hard concept to you.
I don’t know what you’re trying to project on me here. Every tech tree should have the necessary tools to deal with threats for a balanced game.
You’re still completely failing to give an actual reason why the average skill level of the average major player would differ.
*Germany + Sweden
My argument is confirmed by the developer’s actions.
I’m tired boss
No its not. They don’t have the BMPT. They also don’t have the make believe KH-38mt.
Also win rates currently at top tiers prove this statement to be incorrect.
You can have fun and some success certainly as the US - especially with CAS/air - but on the ground you will be outclassed by mythological Russian tanks and your better NATO counterparts.
M1A1HC being the strongest 12.0 right now by a country mile. Objectively yes I dont have the rest of US but in my experience with the AGS and HC its broken.
It’s hard to list what top tier is ‘the best’ since it matters most on what you enjoying playing (since you’re naturally gonna do better in what you like than dislike). Also, top tier ground is plagued with problems currently, aa spam is free sp to the enemy team, cas munition spam is horrible (especially on ah64e and mi28nm), etc.
My opinions on different toptiers:
France and japan have really fast tanks with good reloads, armour is janky for the better since it sometimes saves you even though it shouldn’t
China has incredibly solid tanks, especially ztz99a and wz1001 (they’re incredibly fast with 75km/h top speed and good reverse)
Italy ground is solid as well if you bring centauro I 120, leopard 2a7HU, freccia, samp/t and CAS
Britain is also really good, though that might be a subjective claim since i like playing those tanks,
USA imo is mid in every br, I have rank VII but i cannot enjoy american mbt’s since they don’t really have anything special to them, they’re good at everything, really good at nothing and bad at basically nothing as well.
Israel ground is solid as well though cas is questionable compared to other nations
Sweden lowk has the best top tier since it gets 3 best top tier mbt’s and really good cas with the gripen-E, though i’m not sure how actually fun it is.
A so little bit; This bit advantage is not enough to win the match
I think Germany Sweden should be have Leopard 2 buff ,Because they air power is weak ;And they in earth not any best heli or jet but they have best Leopard 2 in earth; There are many factors that influence top tir match tank, jet, spaa, heli ,ifv…
When one aspect of you is weak, the other must be stronger
As so USSR has bad grounds but best air, huh?
Still, the man asked specifically for grounds, so its only natural to call for germany and sweden