Where is the armor on the Namer, Gaijin...?

Fair

and i have nothing thats declassified that would help

1 Like

Surely your manual says it’s an 80 ton vehicle, right?

That information is probably classified

even if it did i cant post it because literally everything in the manuals will put me behind bars lmao.
magnification on the scope is innacurate tho, but shhhh dont tell nobody i told you xD

1 Like

Honestly im down to help write a mega report on the Merkava 4 and just put in it everything they messed up. I guess the only way is to shove it in their face again and again…

1 Like

Just make sure that the info isn’t classified

It literally says on the manual, classified

1 Like

It’s a damn shame that the weight alone would get you in trouble…

Its just the rules bro, but plenty of evidence is out there. The Israeli gov is pretty notorious for not providing info because of the state the country is always in

That’s fair. It’s kinda lame though for video games.

I wonder if Gaijin will fix the T-90M weight since it’s incorrect.

Professor David Gershon, an expert representing Rafael enterprises in Israel, demonstrated the Shield KE explosive reaction armour used against APFSDS at IAV2021.


IMG_6727

IMG_6676
IMG_6677
The reaction armour unit is a typical sandwich structure, with a vertical total thickness of 47mm and a large area, but a single action only consumes 0.1~0.2kg of explosive, which may not completely detonate the same unit’s load. It has the characteristics of low collateral damage and belongs to the category of SLERA. The inclination of the test target is ~60°, and the surface density is 725kg/m², which is about 92mm of heavy steel thickness.
IMG_6681
IMG_6682
According to the simulation picture, the thickness of the target plate is approximately ~6x40+2x100≈440mmRHA, the remaining wear depth is 54% (~350mm), and the standard wear depth is ~650mm.
Two tests have verified the effectiveness of the reaction armour, which can basically weaken the long pole by 50%. ( Use M322 armour-piercing bullets to shoot)
Looking at the damaged armour module of Mercava 4, we can see that it has similar structural characteristics to the new armour on display.



14 Likes

bro just write a report bro this is gold

7 Likes

@Stona_WT Sorry for the ping, but getting pretty desperate over here. Can you tell us of any progress on this report thats been acknowledged over 9 months ago and still nothing was done about it? https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1eYOWMuJWJ3n

5 Likes

Gaijoobles:
image

3 Likes

Is it legal for you to just say what is wrong without telling how it’s wrong?

I guess, the magnification is much much better irl.
Like better than the pantsir kind of better

well i guess we are not gonna get any answer about this :D

what a waste of time

wdym?