Yes it is and no, it’s not clear.
You know I wasn’t talking about myself ?
According to you.
This is assuming that unbiased and factual data correlates with audience, which is something ludicrous to claim in late 2025.
It’s clear. You just don’t have a logical argument for it. You would get a good idea if you’ve played at least one of the vehicles mentioned. Nice try evading the argument though.
Oh I know, which is why it’s dependent on who the CC is. Anyone can’t claim their educational. They have to prove it which this CC has done as evident by the things he post.
If the playerbase from different social media platforms, and CCs say the same thing, it’s not just me bud.
Point to me where he said something biased? Again, it’s depended on the person. Just because you don’t agree doesn’t mean the majority doesn’t too. Having a minority opinion doesn’t make you right.
It’s funny because not even Alvis will make that claim about Tim’s Variety.
You need to start thinking critically about these things. You can’t look at the stat card in WT as your basis for understanding. It takes looking at deeper level stats, playing it in game (or making an educated guess), and come to an informed decision.
Saying to look at Statshark is a lazy scapegoat
Will the new M10booker have LWS?🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺
We still don’t have a Bradley or a striker with LWS in the game, and Bradley hasn’t even been given dynamic armor. So don’t expect anything for the West. Gaijin will never give it to you.
Are you kidding? They’re afraid to give LWS even to Bradley and Stryker.
Doubt it, also even with LWS it would hardly be worth playing.
Well now it has LWS so no point in arguing
2 Likes
Last question, how do I close this thread?
1 Like
At least they didn’t make us grind another Sepv2 for the LWS modification lol. Crazy that we are getting the booker before Sepv3 though.
5 Likes
Just giving this much is considered very kind to us. Haha.
1 Like
That has been proven exactly how, by you agreeing with it ?
Do you give out some educational stamps of approval ?
You mean the same people just accessing different sites at the same time ?
You still haven’t proven he is unbiased and that he knows what he’s talking about.
Why should I ?
The burden is on you to prove he’s unbiased and factual, as you’re the one bringing Tim in as an argument “chip”.
Never said it does.
It was a response to your claim that something is right because the apparent majority is talking about it.
Forum theory crafting and taking personal opinions as facts is the lazy scapegoat in here.
Nope, it’s the community deems good content. If he starts making inaccurate or biased content, he’ll get called out for it. It’s that simple.
It’s quite simple, find a CC who says that hellfires are on par with vikhrs in terms of AT.
You’re the one who’s saying that he’s not. Have you watched his videos?
Nope, the unlike the 2S38, there is common consensus among the CC and the playerbase that vikhrs is better than hellfire in AT duties. Ask anyone who plays both.
Unlike you, I take a deeper look at the AGM’s performance and come to factual conclusion. You on the other hand point out the basic stat without thinking deeply what they represent.
That higher HE mass you mentioned? You don’t know how it affects the damage. HE mass acts differently on a HEAT warhead, than on HE warhead, the same places you overpressure using a hellfire is the same place you can overpressure using a vikhrs. Penetration doesn’t matter when you’re already hitting vehicles at an angle (significantly reducing their armor effectiveness).
To say
Weighing out stuff like that is hard, hence why we have stat-based balancing instead of performance-based on.
Is an easy way to escape from the debate when you have no substance in your argument. Nice try though.
Again, if you play these vehicles, talk to the people who have or at the very least understanding how the agm performs rather than trying to be a contrarian, you’ll learn probably learn a lot.
Anyways, I’m quite happy the SepV2 got it’s LWS along with a more smoke count. Gives me a reason to actually play the damn thing
1 Like
Only if social media worked that way.
That has nothing to do with proving Tim is unbiased.
You’re the one that firstly brought Tim into the discussion, so I think it’s up to you to show us proof.
Him being a YouTuber doesn’t prove anything.
Only if that was a factual conclusion.