when Gaijin released the China TT. 90% of it is copy and paste. And no model modifications were made.
even replicated vehicles in Finland can have a unique appearance. But those vehicles in China are just completely copied and pasted
Until now, the T26 model is still incorrect
The wheels of T34 have not been replaced with wheels of type 59
M36 is also incorrect, China has only used M36B
There is already a thread with the same name that serves purpose, unlike this one.
Hell, you’re even stupid enough to link it in your post!
The issue had been existed for several years and it brought Chinese tech players serious experience as ZTZ99A have an obvious gap of its ability while compare to other’s mbt. Gaijin should offer players fair playing field especially the competition between tanks
I posted this topic to urge. If we don’t remind, it will sink to the sea and nothing will change
relying solely on these is not enough. How long did it take them to repair the challenger? For several years
and BUFF M1 and Leclerc only posted topics on the forum. It only took a few months
Gaijin如果想中国礼包车和后续的礼包车卖得好就应该赶紧修复99a的模型错误！！！！if Gaijin wants the China gift car and subsequent gift car to sell well, he should quickly fix the model errors of 99a
change the car to a vehicle，there are some grammar errors
As we all know, Gaijin is biased against certain faculties, such as France and Italy, as well as China.
This is an extremely important issue and we hope that Gaijin will revise it immediately
We hope that Gaijin will face up to the problems in the game and make changes immediately
Model errors can make players sad, please fix them as soon as possible
I also hope to see China tanks enhance their combat effectiveness as soon as possible. It’s hard for me to get a sense of accomplishment by destroying China tanks. For example, I can use T-3485 to destroy Tiger 2 and T29, thus gaining a great sense of accomplishment.
Of course, not only the tanks in China, but also other vehicles, helicopters and planes in China.
I often use Leopard and T-80 tanks, and I have been destroyed by China tanks only a handful of times.
The weakness and shortcomings of China tank are fatal, which makes China tank almost impossible to survive after a mistake.
For example, the long loading speed, huge frontal weakness, and very interesting shells that can penetrate 577 mm armor.
Oh! Maybe ZTZ99-3 is not bad? But 99A, the successor of 99, doesn’t adapt to the top environment. 99A is so easy to bully! Destroying 99A is not fun.
In addition, I remember that ZTZ99 tanks have unique laser weapons. Why haven’t I seen these laser weapons? This could have made the Type 99 tank easier to survive.
Moreover, I have been destroyed by Swedish Leopard tanks many times, so it is difficult to fight against Swedish tanks. Destroying Swedish Leopard tanks always makes me feel frightened and tired.
What I want to say is that it is a great idea for foreigners to distribute powerful weapons to some small countries, but it is sad for foreigners to put some big countries aside, just like giving beggars some bad bread.
War thunder often disappoints and depresses me. Every country can have its own characteristics. For example, Germany can have many export Leopard tanks, the United States can have stealth aircraft to counter powerful Russian air defense weapons, and China can have various self-propelled artillery to carry out intensive bombing (laughs).
Unfortunately, the war thunder is not as interesting as I thought.
They aren’t, those are all some of the most secretive countries with a majority of their militaries having little to no information of technology available to the public.
Hell, find me a picture of the interior of a C.1… Let alone something that isn’t brochure-material that mentions its armor protection.
Is it always big data balance, claiming to restore history but with incorrect model values, and thinking that players cannot do without a game? Really lower your head, correct so many mistakes well. There is an ancient Chinese saying that water can carry a boat, but it can also capsize it.
No, it took them several years to completely fix the challenger and there are still errors.
It even takes six months for them to fix the ISRT of Z9WA.
PLZ83 has not received any new shells until now.
Is this what you think efficiency is?
If I don’t post this topic, no one will remember that there were errors in 99A now. What I do is make them remember again
by the way, it took them two years to implement the suggestion of adding two tracks to the 99A chassis
I agree with you. We have no way of knowing what gaijin is thinking, when they will start to revise, and how long it will take.
Gaijin should really publish an announcement when modifying some parameters and models to tell everyone, "Hey! We’re on the move! You don’t have to worry. "
And?
this is very funny, thank you
the first time I saw someone say that they only need such a short amount of time to fix the problem at most
I have never seen people complain about Abrams being referred to as spam, and they have posted countless themes for it
oh, I remember wrong, it seems to be 9 months.
It’s just such a simple question. And for those problems that require model modification, I can’t imagine how long it will take