When will we be able to see gaijin fix the model error in ZTZ99A?

I also hope to see China tanks enhance their combat effectiveness as soon as possible. It’s hard for me to get a sense of accomplishment by destroying China tanks. For example, I can use T-3485 to destroy Tiger 2 and T29, thus gaining a great sense of accomplishment.
Of course, not only the tanks in China, but also other vehicles, helicopters and planes in China.

I often use Leopard and T-80 tanks, and I have been destroyed by China tanks only a handful of times.
The weakness and shortcomings of China tank are fatal, which makes China tank almost impossible to survive after a mistake.
For example, the long loading speed, huge frontal weakness, and very interesting shells that can penetrate 577 mm armor.

Oh! Maybe ZTZ99-3 is not bad? But 99A, the successor of 99, doesn’t adapt to the top environment. 99A is so easy to bully! Destroying 99A is not fun.
In addition, I remember that ZTZ99 tanks have unique laser weapons. Why haven’t I seen these laser weapons? This could have made the Type 99 tank easier to survive.
Moreover, I have been destroyed by Swedish Leopard tanks many times, so it is difficult to fight against Swedish tanks. Destroying Swedish Leopard tanks always makes me feel frightened and tired.

What I want to say is that it is a great idea for foreigners to distribute powerful weapons to some small countries, but it is sad for foreigners to put some big countries aside, just like giving beggars some bad bread.

War thunder often disappoints and depresses me. Every country can have its own characteristics. For example, Germany can have many export Leopard tanks, the United States can have stealth aircraft to counter powerful Russian air defense weapons, and China can have various self-propelled artillery to carry out intensive bombing (laughs).

Unfortunately, the war thunder is not as interesting as I thought.

5 Likes

They aren’t, those are all some of the most secretive countries with a majority of their militaries having little to no information of technology available to the public.

Hell, find me a picture of the interior of a C.1… Let alone something that isn’t brochure-material that mentions its armor protection.

Is it always big data balance, claiming to restore history but with incorrect model values, and thinking that players cannot do without a game? Really lower your head, correct so many mistakes well. There is an ancient Chinese saying that water can carry a boat, but it can also capsize it.

2 Likes

No, it took them several years to completely fix the challenger and there are still errors.
It even takes six months for them to fix the ISRT of Z9WA.
PLZ83 has not received any new shells until now.
Is this what you think efficiency is?

If I don’t post this topic, no one will remember that there were errors in 99A now. What I do is make them remember again

2 Likes

by the way, it took them two years to implement the suggestion of adding two tracks to the 99A chassis
QQ图片20240430211422

4 Likes

I agree with you. We have no way of knowing what gaijin is thinking, when they will start to revise, and how long it will take.
Gaijin should really publish an announcement when modifying some parameters and models to tell everyone, "Hey! We’re on the move! You don’t have to worry. "

1 Like

And?

this is very funny, thank you
the first time I saw someone say that they only need such a short amount of time to fix the problem at most

I have never seen people complain about Abrams being referred to as spam, and they have posted countless themes for it

1 Like

oh, I remember wrong, it seems to be 9 months.

It’s just such a simple question. And for those problems that require model modification, I can’t imagine how long it will take

Z9WA缺少IRST自动跟踪//Gaijin.net//问题

Ok?

I only require it to be “balanced”. But it doesn’t even meet the standard of balance
but i only saw a pile of shit, which remained unchanged for two years

1 Like

until now, the pterosaur1 drone can only use the AKD9, rather than the AKD10 at the same level as other countries
although it was submitted to developers two years ago

翼龙1应该有AKD10/Ba7 - Documented Aircraft Suggestions - War Thunder - 官方论坛

Pterosauria1 can use AKD10 // Gaijin.net // Issues

1 Like

it’s okay, at least I’ve proven how slow it is to fix these errors. not as you said

3 Likes

You haven’t proven any figures previously stated?

Support the author’s point! China’s 99A should have its various errors fixed as soon as possible. As we all know, a tank is a work completed by countless military personnel, and the wrong model is a blasphemy to their efforts. I sincerely hope to see the repaired 99A soon!

2 Likes

you’d better solve this ASAP

1 Like

Gaijin please fix this bug, it is driving us nut

1 Like

As a player of the Chinese tech tree, I believe that this fix is very necessary.

1 Like

You should know the Chinese community (with more than 100k players, using Tieba, Bilibili and other Chinese speaking platforms so non-CN players know really less about them) have a lots of misunderstand of how Official forum and Community site works
Like the “I have same issue” is usually called “vote” in Chinese community, and many players believe having more “votes” could make the issue be fixed faster
Or they don’t know adding payload and/or shells for a vehicle is always works as a suggestion, not a issue (i even saw a issue said mephisto should have HOT2)
The language barrier even makes the misunderstand worse

4 Likes

Totally agreed, don’t know if gaijin staff plays their own game or not, when you play top tier Chinese MBT you feel like its armor is even not as strong as the 10.0s 96a and 96ap, when you look at the model there is just a gigantic hole in the mantlet, it is so easy to penetrate like even near that area, but when I play the soviet tanks it never happens, why russian bias? So unfair, go play your game and feel it and us.

1 Like