1 Like
Tried to sneak the T-14 in there lol, you should replace it with the EMBT (KNDS) for the true ‘destructive trio’
U have leo 2a8 and i think more abrams veriants that isnt that powerfull like the abrams x
I bet russia has smt like that too so it will take a while
T14 lmao
2 Likes
One is just seen moving around, the other is a joke, even late soviet prototypes may have better armor layout and the other need a wood to keep it in place. More like destroyed trio, jokes apart, I’d say T-14 is more likely to be added, compared to the Abrams X and KF51 are just demonstration models.
I’m pretty sure Rheinmetal is selling KF51s, primarily to Italy, but the AbramsX is just a TD.
Italy and hungary so we can get 2 variants of the KF-51 as soon as they are showed to the public
Stop underestimating the Armata. NO ONE is stupid enough to create a machine that’s worse than what he already has, so the T-14 is at least T-90M/T-80BVM level. And it has better armament, better mobility and an unmanned turret.
It’s gonna be pretty easy to kill when it comes to the game. Big LFP and semi-vertically stowed ammo.
I personally dont think they will add these tanks for another couple years if even then.
id like for them to fix the problems with the mbts we have already in the game before adding more
My guess would be next year. For modern MBTs, we have a few more to add, 2A8, SEPv3 and SEPv4, the T series obr. 2022-24s etc. Once we have all then, which shouldn’t take too long to add, then we would probably get these next gen MBTs. Unless they decide to focus on air again like they did last year, but i doubt they would do that two years in a row.
I honestly wouldn’t put it past gaijin to keep up on this bs
I didn’t say it’s perfect, only dangerous and definately not to be underestimated.
Honestly, nether do I. But we can hope, at least. Last year wasn’t very good for ground at all, and especially not top tier ground. No new MBTs in a year, unless you include Leopard 2A7 but it has a 50 cal or Leopard 2 but with slightly different camo and different or T-80, but different country or a camo net.
The only real advantage it would have over a T-90M or T-80BVM would be the APS and mobility. If they add rounds like DM73, DM83, and M829A4, then it’s armor won’t be worth much. And for firepower, your still shooting the same places as you would with a weaker round. Not even mentioning that you can go through the turret with a Bushmaster.
According to what accurate information?
BTW, 3BM69 is no joke.
We have seen the armor on the turret. It’s a thin composite screen cover with a thin layer of RHA behind. It’s mostly spaced armor.
1 Like
I hope you are right. The free worlds has a bad history of underestimating the power of evil.
Selling doesn’t means it’s in service, it would need years of testing in their respective country environments.