I don’t see why we can’t have things that could have been built if they were planned reasonably to some degree. It’s a game after all.
It would help some nations get a boost.
Japan could get the O-I for a Tech Tree Heavy Tank and Sweden could get the Kranvagn/Centurion Mk.10 project for a heavy tank.
They were both decently planned and could be fun to have in the game.
Considering the amount of people screaming about how making APHE more realistic is bad, I don’t see any counter argument anymore. People want unrealistic APHE, so it should be fine to also have things that weren’t fully completed within reason.
The Tiger UHT is a production helicopter that is in-service with the German military. Ho-229 is not, thus comparing them in War Thunder is a false equivalence fallacy.
Your post is null-and-void purely from mentioning Yak-141 BTW, dismissed on that ground alone.
Yeah and what stop Chin turret mount for UHT when thing that not even real or put in to service can be in the game? It can be separate vehicles for all i care
Prove that 1- A turret is a production vehicle.
Or 2- Tiger UHT is an UNFINISHED prototype vehicle.
OR prove that Ho-229 [and all of the other unfinished prototypes of war thunder] is a fully production vehicle with service.
Tiger UHT can only be compared to other production vehicles such as F-14B, AH-64D, Mig-29G, Ka-52, Gripen, etc.
War Thunder has different rules for production, finished prototypes, and unfinished prototypes; common knowledge for over half a decade now… -_-
Instead of saying they did not have one as a counter argument, you decided it was appropriate to launch a Strawman argument about a Ka-52 being sat in by a Bavaria tourist lol.