GDR’s NVA Mi-24 were only Mi-24P, Mi-24D.
1 Like
This is why I reject their attitude towards historical accuracy and removing/gatekeeping vehicles because of it. Why don’t we all make a stand against Gaijin’s hypocrisy in this regard?
Because they want listen again. Because all community won’t stand for it. Or many other reasons which i don’t want to speak over and over again. Double standards of Gaijin is terrible.
That was people, not devs themselves.
So because Ho-229 is in the game you reject them…
Your post opposes War Thunder’s consistency and claims consistency is hypocrisy…
There are zero double standards.
“They treat Germany different from Germany. They give Germany [Ho-229 etc] everything and don’t give Germany anything!”
Which is nonsensical.
Claiming that consistent actions are anything other than consistent is easily seen as malicious.
Tbh as Swedish players i never want both of them maybe i feel unnecessary since i had three Strv122 and I don’t feel need for heli that don’t have MAW or thermal
1 Like
On top of that, in Gaijin’s own words “Trialed vehicles from other countries are a last-resort consideration for tech trees.” @Ralin
On top of that, the Mi-28A was not in War Thunder in any tech tree prior to its addition to Sweden. Not copy-paste.
And T-80U? It is a sidegrade to what’s available in tech tree.
USSR has 2S25M in tech tree, a Centauro 120 equivalent vehicle.
I voted yes on that poll personally cause I don’t rightly care, it’s inferior to the 2S25M and would be humorous.
Players aren’t doing double standards though.
T-80U at the time had no option as Finland wasn’t in-game yet, and Norway was even further out.
Mi-28A over MH-60? Norway was further out than Mi-28A’s addition, that and Norway only relatively recently got MH-60.
It even make less sense than Britain got T-90 because India is sub tree of Britain Sweden on the other hand only test T-80U and MI-28A never put into service and USSR are not Swedish sub tree
Mi-28A was never put into service by any country. It failed every trial to begin with.
Which confirms that it was built and tested, thus applying to War Thunders strict and hypocritical vehicle double standards.
Thanks for proving Gaijin’s consistent and uses the same standards for everyone.
Stop making false claims.
1 Like
I kinda like the twin 30mm guns that the Hind P gets, but a V would be nice. I need something to grind lol
He has a point really plus eurocopter tiger are no stranger to chin mount turrets
(more real than Yak141 and F-16AJ)
1 Like
I don’t see why we can’t have things that could have been built if they were planned reasonably to some degree. It’s a game after all.
It would help some nations get a boost.
Japan could get the O-I for a Tech Tree Heavy Tank and Sweden could get the Kranvagn/Centurion Mk.10 project for a heavy tank.
They were both decently planned and could be fun to have in the game.
Considering the amount of people screaming about how making APHE more realistic is bad, I don’t see any counter argument anymore. People want unrealistic APHE, so it should be fine to also have things that weren’t fully completed within reason.
The Tiger UHT is a production helicopter that is in-service with the German military. Ho-229 is not, thus comparing them in War Thunder is a false equivalence fallacy.
Your post is null-and-void purely from mentioning Yak-141 BTW, dismissed on that ground alone.
That’s a strawman.
Yeah and what stop Chin turret mount for UHT when thing that not even real or put in to service can be in the game? It can be separate vehicles for all i care
sarcasm is not a strawman, btw GDR never had a Mi-24V but this is fiction to want one.
A strawman is dumbing down someone’s argument to make it seem easier to counter. What you did is exactly that.
What kind of argument? It is a fictitious wishful thinking not even remotely constructive.