US doesn’t even have a “true” IFV (I know that the Bradley is an IFV in the sense of war thunder, but it isn’t truly an IFV). No LAV or Stryker chassis IFV’s yet is just dumb.
if it let you first, these twin 30mm would vaporise your track
32mm vs 15mm of armor is not that much of a difference
Congrats, you found the strongest part of an MBT hull turned into an IFV
With the barrel whip issue the BMPT has, you might find it difficult to even pinpoint their track in full auto. The IRL dispersion of those guns is very poor and well known.
but the bradley is an IFV. unless you mean wheeled ifvs, which is a subset of ifvs
yes youre correct in thinking of the bmpt only having access to ap/apds with one barrel, this is due to the fact the guns selected didnt have the capability to be duel fed like other guns and without having a crew member in the turret that could swap over the belts means that whatever you brought loaded to that gun was the only belt youre gonna have access to unless you get out and manually change it from the outside, in the battlefield… you can see why they went with the twin gun arrangement.
1 Like
Thanks for confirming, that was one thing I heard but didn’t have decent info for.
add these at 10.3 to balance things
It’s more of a technicality thing, M3 Bradley is classified as a Cavalry Fighting Vehicle, which isn’t inherently all that different from an IFV. I’m just butt hurt that we don’t have some of our iconic pieces like the LAV-25, Dragoon or any of the other Stryker chassis with auto cannons.
1 Like
Which I can’t not see these being lower than battle rating 9.7 if Gaijin intent to implement these with one anti-infantry fragment belt and anti-armor belt. For balance purposes obviously, it does already have an ok missiles available, two cannons shooting APDS would be way too much in my opinion.
there’s plenty of vehicles that aren’t IFVs that get called that, the Begleitpanzer and 2S38 for example, it’s just for the sake of brevity.
LAV-25+ATM would be cool
honestly
as far as US goes
I just want a Humvee with TOWS
1 Like
The Bagel and the 2S38 don’t fit the definition of an IFV, which involves troop capacity, just like how the M3 doesn’t, which is why they are not called IFVs.
Infantry aren’t in War Thunder and the vehicles fill the same gameplay role.
9.7 IFV can’t compete with top tier IFV or against 12.0 MBT
I think the priority should be giving Britain, Japan and China an equivalent to the 2S38 and BMP-2M.
Those 3 nations still lack decent 10.3+ IFV/AFVs. And quite frankly. the USSR does have a semi-equivalent in the form of the 2S38 sure it doesnt have FnF ATGMs, but in gun power, its easily the better of nearly all of those mentioned IFV/AFVs
Take your EFV and see ya next year lol
Too bad ig barrel whip is non existence and the Ruski 30mm is just plain better than the Bushmaster in all way.
1 Like
Get real. The BMP-2M is a better vehicle than both.
1 Like