hmm i think scorpion has something about its turret traverse btw
1 Like
do send it my way if you find it. Scorpion information is usable for scimitar as they are identical other than gun in their initial configurations. same for sabre as its a scorpion with fox turret
1 Like
Ah right well that bins that then doesnt it
1 Like
did you find it?
1 Like
Its not usuable its about the scorpions systems. no definitive turret traverse rates so.
Think going by warrior is a better solution, seeing as 1. warrior is in game and 2, has more data for it.
the only difference between scimitar and scorpion is the gun, everything else is identical between the vehicles so does still have merit to getting the vehicle correct
1 Like
Suppose I can try that mate, I was meaning in relation to the fox.
Which suppose makes no sense why did jarms use the scimitar report, which does actually have sources, while non actively cite a definite number, to nerf the fox?
It makes no sense.
Two of said sources, I’ve read on my PC in scotland and they do not mention turret traverse speed.
They mention that over the years it went from manual to an upgraded faster FCS.
Soooo
the reports are junk IMO
1 Like
Just Gaijin
1 Like
I have no clue. he’s also responsible for the report that gave the 3.7 ram 800hp, by using a document which got figures blatantly wrong (as if it wasn’t obvious it was wrong)
I believe this was either for scimitar 2 or its LEP upgrade significantly after the model we have in game existed
1 Like
Yes however the sources do mention that before it moved onto the full upgrade program, they were trialing the standard Scim with an improved FCS for both turret traverse and target acquisition
I musta missed that one…
1 Like
That’s nothing new…Gaijin can make changes for whatever reason.
1 Like
I like the Falcon to go back to 7.7 it fills the gap perfectly and back when it got moved up there was a high use of apds and dodgy heat mechanics when most the tanks were empty and because lack of spalling on apds that increase its br
1 Like