Again give us the 23mm milk truck from Finland, excellent velocity, great firerate, very cool finnish Camo that gaijin will mess up as per usual, and its a truck so im just saying just add that at 5.0, it would be held back by its angles for the gun so it could actually go on the 5.0 lineup, you know 2 vehicles. 1 thats good the other we dont talk about.
Bosvark is 5.3 with the same gun. Similarly limited gun angles, though the cabin is armored against 7.7mm and crew well spread. Still probably not weak enough for 4.7 with that firepower. At any rate far more useful AA than U-SH 204 GK. The 20mm milk truck would likely be 3.0, though still with enough firepower until 23mm.
ZBSD on china at 4.3: hi
Again if that thing which is just a better BTR ZD can sit that low then i really dont see that argument that it cant be 4.7 also i suggest 5.0, 4.7 sweden is a fairytale
1 Like
according to ointres.se, 326, so if it fires 120 shots per minute, you got atleast 2 and a half minutes of firing
Edit:
That being said, aren’t SPAAs now able to put down ammo boxes or is it limited to specific ones?
A Leopard 1A3 and a Marder were leased for a year starting autumn 1976. This is when the UDES 19 driving and firing rig was built on the Marder. Afaik this was never about acquasition but rather about learning about foreign vehicles
You might be thinking about the Norwegian trials where a strv 103 was put up against a leo 1?
1 Like
326 is right, so nearly as much as the M19. 326 is a strange number as 40 mm ammo is fed in 4 round clips and 326 adds up to 81 clips and 2 individual shells. But it is what is recorded on the official data sheet. Rof is 120 per gun so should be able to achieve 240 rpm if implemented properly (if…)
3 Likes
The vehicle has two guns, so you need to half that number, to 1 minute and 21 seconds of firing. Not bad though. Very similar to the M19 SPAA.
I’m curious. We know that Sweden had competitions that gave us the Strv 122 and the AHS + Mi-28 for consideration to purchase but has Sweden ever did something like that for the air force?
Yes but not to those extents, comprised of F 18, F16 and maybe M2K
I dont think they ever used any in a trial
Finland Halli air trials much? Mig 29, F16, Gripen, F18, look its funny that finland is pretty much a joke of a “Tech tree” considering the lack of TT vehicles and that gaijin is willing to ignore that they exist as much as the next warthunder players but they do exist somewhat within the nordic TT lol
I dont think we would ever get the mig 29 or mirage and the rest can be added under the subnations already on the tree
Solution: Give DK or NOR, FIN is already a joke kinda like the swedish air tree.
Atleast i have my J21 with exhadurated overheating while in flight,
The J22s are great allrounders specialising in none though. except maybe firepower
The best way to describe the swedish air TT, a jack of all trades and masters of none.
1 Like
Well except the J32B that thing is just good at nothin tbh, sure energy retention ig, but it often works against you
Again sweden air needs some actual love the TT as a majority is just awful. Im missing like 20 things until i have everything spaded and early swedish jets are just garbage. I like some of them but when i can play every other nation and find 3-4 better vehicles at even lower BR’s there is a problem. Its like 6.7-9.3 is majorly garbage. Its okay since gaijin would rather sell us another premium with no lineup or a garbage over BRed squadron BMP.
I find the A29B and J29F the best early jets
1 Like
Literally the only semi decent ones so not suprised
Speaking of the air section of the Swedish tech tree, the Finnish Fiat G.50.
Heres one standing in the hangar at F 6 Karlsborg getting ready to be flown to Finland, unfortunately it would never arrive.
Also whats this about the Swedish air tree, I don’t think i found a single aircraft i didnt like up to rank 6 where i am, perhaps the S17BS, bombing with that is just annoying.
1 Like
We need higher BR additions like 5.x or 6.x especially CAS as Sweden is lacking in those areas.