Hadn’t crew it and been thinking about doing it. It’s about .7 higher than the T-90A, and it has a quicker turret turning rate for sure, what quality does it have over the T-90A to justify a .7 br? FCS seem pretty close. If I perform horrible in the T-90A, can I expect magic from this one?
4 Likes
You get much better gun handling, improved forward mobility and ERA bags on sides which can be helpful. Other than that, not really. You’re still limited with sub-par reload, trash reverse and gun depression.
It is noticeably better than T-90A and should be decent enough for 11.7, at least in my opinion.
It’s a good tank, better than the T-80U I would argue, but get ready for the most atrocious stock grind of your life.
The UBH mod and 3BM60 are both tier IV and you need those to be competitive. Without them, it is 11.0/11.3 material.
Its ok for its br. And I don’t see why the T80U+ doesn’t get svinets now
The T-80U’s (excluding UD) do have Svinets. Svinets is 3BM46.
Most of the T-80s with Svinets are 11.7, same BR as the T-72B3. NOT giving the T-80s Svinets gives more reason for people to play the B3 to try out Svinets II (3BM60).
Along with that this question was asked before, Don’t mind the 11.3, since everything got moved up 0.3 BR a few patches ago.
It’s basically a better T-90A in every way but a worse T-90M.
Better maneuverability and gun handling than the T-90A, but the T-90M is just better.
But it does very well at 11.7, more like a sidegrade to the T-80U’s, Trading maneuverability and reload speed for better thermals, gun handling, and ammunition.
T-80u is the same br as the m1a2s lmfao, which also happen to get a top tier shell as well as a reload buff
you’re forgetting something important.
The M1A2 gets the nerf of US Mains.
5 Likes
Good tips, I gonna play only when the enemy team has USA, I guess the stock grind will be much easier bro
1 Like
yea i forgot, thats taken as granted nowadays
1 Like
You lose the APS, LWS and programmable HE to be just better in every other regard.
Depends on the problems you’re having with the T-90A. If it’s the forward speed to contest positions, handless animals in 2S38s/TURMS/UDs and poor gun handling; maybe the B3 can work for you, if it’s the poor reverse/reload and bad survivability; probably not.
The stock grind is from hell so have fun.
2 Likes
I think the UBH mod should be moved to tier III, or at least make it so without it the T-72B3 is 11.3 BR.
1 Like
And don’t forget that he now has a useless 4th crew member.
Even so it should only be 11.0 it is absolutely worse than Leo2A5
I’d make it Rank I or remove the grind for it entirely, the B3 when stock is a T-72B '89 (10.3 BR) with extra turret traverse
insane
Would argue that it is better than the T90M , considering it engine perform better , cause lighter vehicle i believe and smaller profile. The only thing where it is consider worse than the T90M is armor which fair if you do count that. But overall I rate the B3 better
It uses Relikt iirc, unless I’m thinking of the B3M;
Also has much more competitive ammunition.
I think the armor makes a BIG difference. Especially the spall liner.
But yes, The B3 is smaller and technically more mobile. But mobility in the T-72 series is always kinda dookie.
no the abrams gets a nerf from this russian company that doesn’t know how to read bug reports or understand standard english. Make o mistake every abrams including the D.U ammo is nothing like it should be, because if it was, no tank in this game would be able to survive a direct hit from any of the D.U Rounds.
2 Likes
Yeah, the same “russian company” that makes the T-72’s reload be 1 second slower than it is in real life for balancing reasons.
Probably the reason why it isn’t in the game was stated by yourself:
Either they would have to model a new mechanic or it would be too broken if added.