What is this "Nagato"?

Gaijin.net // Issues
So, Gaijin decided to dismantle all the armor on the 1922 Nagato class and call it the 1944 Nagato?





where is my armor gaijin???
Do you want players to pay $80 just for something like this?
If you don’t want to do it, you can choose not to do it. No one is asking you to make a new IJN battleship pack.
old issue has been closed,new one has been resubmitted. Please support:
[dev]Nagato armor // Gaijin.net // Issues

2 Likes

Might be not finished yet. Iirc correctly Bismarcks armor was completely scuffed for the entirety of the Devserver

No, I don’t think it’s “unfinished”. You can compare what Kongo was made by them:



Compare the same class ship in 1922:


1 Like

That doesnt really prove that its unfinished tho. It just proves that Gaijin is even too lazy to copy and paste

2 Likes

dont make me tap the sign
image

shockingly, the test server for unfinished things has an unfinsihed ship!

1 Like

So, how do you evaluate Kongo?Is it finished?
Can you guarantee that the Nagato on the dev server is really “unfinished” and will not appear on the live server like this?

the bismark on the dev server had a crew of 11 and no armour outside of the ammo belt. when it came to live, it got a crew count of 2,221 and was fully modeled/armoured

4 Likes

Yes, that’s great, but so far, the huge armor holes on Kongo are still there and have not been fixed. It’s the same with Nagato on the dev server. How can I believe it’s in an “unfinished” state now instead of being intentionally made like this by Gaijin?

And how can you believe it is intentionally made like this by gaijin and not just in an unfinished state?

Your argument stands on rotten peg legs.

2 Likes

On stream devs said that it model not finished yet.

Because they have done this more than once, kongo、kirishima、myoko、haruna、yamato、 Many, many, I always think that gaijin didn’t finish them on the dev server, and every time they go to the live server, they are still the same.
You can open my issue link and click on my profile to see how many mistakes they have made. Perhaps
you can make a bet with me to see if Nagato will still be like this on the live server.

They always say that, but if you don’t point out their mistakes, they will do nothing, pretend everything is normal, and then move everything to the live server as is. Have you forgotten Leopards’ basket? If it weren’t for the attacks from the player community, they wouldn’t change anything.

The issue has been resubmitted. Please support:
[dev]Nagato armor // Gaijin.net // Issues

It is the dev server. The model isn’t finished.
iirc Bismarck had a maximum of 35mm everywhere on the hull until the update went live.

Armor viewer likes to lie a lot too. What we may see as one thing is entirely different in reality.

Because Kongou generally likes to not die in combat because of its armor scheme.

Don’t deceive yourself, gaijin has closed all my reports, and they do consider the current status as’ finished ’

Gaijin does not deserve their playerbase.

1 Like

To add on to this;
I guess the US Navy was just lying when they made this report. According to Gaijin the armor deck should’ve been obliterated.
image

1 Like

Everything on dev is unfinished. We can quabble about sourcing, but everything on dev is unfinished. Ships can be wildly unfinished and have placeholder armor and stats. This is very common, even if it is a sister ship of a ship already ingame.

Also, Gaijin did not make up 1944. I know a lot of the years they list for ships are wrong, but they have been shockingly good with them this update, and 1944 is correct. I checked their work, I can confirm 1944 is accurate to the armament fit it has. It was fitted this way at Kure Naval Arsenal from 27 June to 8 July, 1944. This is not the fit that Nagato underwent from 25 November to I think 20 December (not exactly sure), 1944, that was at Yokosuka, this is the earlier in the year fit from Kure.

1 Like

Most part of those ‘rolled homogenous armor’ on Mutsu are actually not RHA in real life. They are high tensile steel. It is not structual steel, but definitely about half the effectiveness of RHA.

So it is not 1944 Nagato is bugged, but 1922 Mutsu is artificially buffed.

1 Like