I’m not saying the Namer is overpowered, did you not see the title of this post?
I was asking for clarification if the BMPTs br is whats making it “op” and not them saying “its op in general”
At its br it has incredibly good armour and a decent armament. Also the crew less turret makes it hard to kill, even shooting it from side on isn’t a guaranteed kill
Plus some weirdly modelled protection making it harder to kill than in this case a Namer, whilst having decent armament. I dare not say it’s better than the Namers but I can say it’s not THAT worse to be at the BR it is right now.
We’d need Gaijing to actually clarify why and which procedures they went through to model the BMPTs, how the protection is gimmicky and why it’s been placed at said BR range.
It’s protection is the same as the T-90ms hull wise, there’s nothing notable different about it.
The turret on the T-90M is existent and shootable. The BMPTs turret is ass-modelled and if you shoot you have a lot of chances of it not damaging anything.
It’s modeled just fine, it’s literally a low profile turret. No shit the T-90s turret is “existent” it’s huge.
The turret is modeled exactly how it’s supposed to be model, there isn’t supposed to be some artifical gap made for it.
AGS is a great example of low profile. The only difference is that it’s hull isn’t based of a tank chassis so it doesn’t have the equivalent armor protection.