Can someone explain why the Namer is at a higher br, than the Terminator.
Because both the Namer and Terminators are both HAFVs. Because if anything, the BR of the Namer and Terminator should be swapped around.
The Namer can’t survive any apfsds rounds to save it’s life (let me correct myself) The Merkava tank chassis can’t survive top tier darts or less to the front)), with nerfed chemical protection compared to real life, and the Merkavas are supposed to be one of the most armoured tanks in the world, but this brings in a misconception that it’s only protected against Chemical rounds and not kinetic because of the evnrionment it’s always fighting in.
Meanwhile the Terminator has armor that the Namer should have but it’s at way lower BR with even more effective weapons.
1 Like
Could be “APFSDS” Claim but I agree namer 30 should be 10.7 and the Trishkon 11.0 and the BPMT 11.0
2 Likes
Money, combined with minor nation syndrome, with a bit of players having difficulty dealing with Russian tanks.
And Gaijin constantly overrates how good spikes are, despite modelling all FnF missiles as having poor flight paths.
Apfsds and fire forget missiles.
Bmpt should also be 11.0 or 11.3
Not to forget apds at such tier can be hard some times
2 Likes
gaijin thinks spikes are good
2 Likes
F&F ATGMs, APFSDS and active protection system (yes I know it’s bugged). And the BMPT is most likely to go up again.
I dunno, I get OHKed probably 80% of the time one of those things hits me, of course that doesn’t count the number of them that lost tracking and didn’t make it.
But is a SPIKE carrier gets on a point on a flat map like sands of Sinai and goes hull down with infinite SPIKES you are screwed.
1 Like
This is my main problem. If gaijin gave the Namers their actual armor this wouldn’t be much of a problem, but no your 60+ ton “light tank” is less armored than this Russian autocannon vehicle that weighs ~15 tons less bc yes. If there wasn’t such a thing as Russian bias before the BMPT, there is now.
1 Like
Honestly Namer survivability is better than the majority of 10.7 IFV’s with spikes, its a compression problem it shouldn’t be the same BR as the CV90 MKIV which is just worse.
Same goes for the KF41 whoch is pretty mid too especially with the CRV II coming to 10.7 we need a ground decomp to 15.0 so we can properly space vehicles out and get some Overtiered vehicles a solid BR thie includes CAS and tanks as most Helicopters are either too strong (G lynx) or pretty DOA for their BR. The AH64A ect.