There are alliance Nation TT suggestions ;)
Regardless of the odds of being added, if the vehicle is capable enough I think it merits a suggestion, if one wants it bad enough. Trying and possibly failing at something you want is better than doing nothing and definitely failing at getting what you want, IMO.
Just gotta get my thumb out and get to it, I guess. :P
1 Like
would’ve been an awesome suggestion, if it wasn’t for the autocannon it has. 20mm akan m/47d is barely able to penetrate anything
so sweden deserves all export variants of their stuff that is currently not in their tree and than thats like saying bc the leo is german all leos should go to germany. wouldnt all bofors go to sweden then?
Been wanting this for ages
The 20mm Akan m/47D should have an APCR-HEI-T round. That on paper has more pen than the standard APCR or HVAP. It is called the, ehem:
spårljusbrandhalvpansargranat m/95
it is an, Incendiary-tipped Tungsten-core High-explosive-incendiary-shell with a Tracer. phew.
And the Ikv 103 has an APHE-BC chell. “Slpgr m/43” with 57mm of pen with a funny amount of HE filler.
Finally the IKV 103s biggest enemy chall be slain! debree!
6 Likes
This boi The Udes 33 SPAA brother
Also, The pvrbv 551 gang- Shame the Ksp 56 gunner didnt have a built in mount for the vehicle.
Also another thing, realistically the Pvrbv 551 could have its Robot 55 launcher lowered and hatches closed when traveling at anything higher than marching speed. As it would be a safety hazzard not to be bouckled down in the seats inside when moving.
2 Likes
Looks interesting, how would it compare to Lvrbv 701?
Also, is that thing on the back a reloading mechanism?
1 Like
It would perform exactly as the Udes 33 except with the Rbs 70 launcher.
Yep the BV 551 platform uses it aswell.
1 Like
If its not officialy claimed by another nation in the game /sub tree yes. Thats the whole point i am making.
Vehicles that do not have a home go to their developer nation.
In the case of CVs sweden. In case of leopards germany. It is as easy as that.
If its not claimed by another nation yes.
Now you are getting ridiculous thats a gun, not a vehicle.
Thats like saying all thanks based/licensed on the Rheinmetall smoothbore should go to germany
What’s that? How much more pen does it have in comparison to in-game HVAP?
Bet it will have just as horrible damage as HVAP, but that HEI aspect sounds very cool for multi-purpose approach (e.g. Pbv 302 BILL being atrocious at AT/AA job in most of the cases)
Edit: nvm, found your new post about it
1 Like
sounds awesome, one must hope for these to get added…
upd: nevermind, both of these bug reports are quite old, we aren’t seeing those in-game
How did you calculate the penetration of the m/95-round?
Either way, it would go very well with a Pbv 302C, which had added appliqué ceramic armor and internal spall liners, to make a nifty little scouting vehicle.
Also-
Bruh! I swear I thought this was in the game already. My brain must’ve fumbled together the UDES 33, Pvrbv 551, and the Lvrbv 701 in some way making me think that.
Maybe someone can make a suggestion for it? :)
Low tier AA option, quad machine gun contraption on truck, kinda like a Swedish P.7.T AA.
2 Likes
Yes, the fact that sweden lacks a 1.0 SPAA irritates me beyond belief. Honestly id really like an SPAA to replace the 301, for 3.7 also cause its just too slow.
3 Likes
Not enough sources or info about it, farther than it being a Rbs 70 launcher
Input the stats of the round on the krupp counter and the calibre of around 8-9mm of the AP core from what blockhaj told me.
Yes, it would definitely be fun to see another vehicle that the Swedish army actually used, like the Pbv 302C. But the reality is that it just doesn’t fit in War Thunder.
Without the BILL launcher (which it never had), you’re left with a 20 mm cannon that’s too weak for higher BRs, paired with armor that only stops MG or HMG fire. The 302C did mount a Ksp 58 as a coaxial, but that would hardly change anything in terms of effectiveness. To make the gun feel relevant, the vehicle would need to be placed much lower in BR — but then its technology and features would be completely out of place and unrealistic for that tier.
So in practice, it ends up in a lose–lose situation: either useless at its historical BR, or completely unrealistic if moved down. That’s why the only reason the current BILL variant works in-game at all is because of the missile system.
Its sad and i really like the Pbv 302s but, at the end. its not a great choice…
Could be a bit OP
1 Like
Not really as you will ammo-rack the vehicle if you shoot the ammo in the launcher tubes,
Fun fact: You can destroy the Pbv 302 BILL if you shoot the missile tube since it will cause the vehicle to detonate… Even if it is a meter above the whole vehicle
besides what karnitin mentioned, Gaijin would also def limit the height of the thing, similar to how they limit telescopic masts
1 Like