Yeah, well…
That’s gaijin
Strv m/48, a proposed upgrade for the Strv m/40 with a 25 mm akan m/32 that could fire APDS at 180rpm
A Swedish & Brittish project to put a Centurion Mk10 turret on a Strv KRV’s hull, it never was completed
Pbil m/39, a Pbil m/40 with better engine, Scania-Vabis 142 hk vs Volvo 135 hp and better gun, a 20 mm Madsen (400rpm) vs 20 mm Bofors (360rpm)
9 Likes
Wasn’t this one specifically in service of Danish army? Would be great to see it as we slowly get more and more Danish vehicles, and we don’t have researchable Pbil
4 Likes
More Danish things snail pls i beg. I have all of the danish vehicles, hell i love Denmark so much i got 2 Pbil m40’s since it was the first unique vehicle i got on sweden and made it look like it was in Danish service.
I believe this was a squeezebore gun, so not sure if it could fire APDS. In-game, squeezebore-rounds seem to be displayed as APCR as seen on the German Sd.Kfz 221.
1 Like
it says that its a “Flänsprojektil” but idk what that means
it was for the danes, even if they wont add it as a danish vehicle, we can still get it, like how the americans got the Stingray, but id bet that it would be danish if they added it to the main tree
I dont even care if it lacks our flag i just want more Danish vehicles
2 Likes
No worries :)
“Flänsprojektil” in this case is a projectile with flanges around it that compresses as it goes down the barrel. These flanges contains the gas pressure behind the projectile causing it to accelerate even more as the barrel tapers down in diameter without compromising the integrity and ballistics of the projectile in a negative way.
“Drivspegel” would be the main word for APDS in Swedish, I believe. Prefixed with “Underkalibrig Projektil” or something similar. No biggie though. :)
4 Likes
The firerate of the Madsen is the only advantage, with top penetration of just 35mm compared to 38mm.
3 Likes
I really hope in the future we can get some decompression that will also allow us to get some more interwar vehicles with lower performance like this one in the earlier ranks without being DOA, since they can combat each other instead.
Finger crossed!
1 Like
A bit upsetting the TML doesn’t have its actual Camo
CV90105 TML missing Tricolor woodland Camo // Issues Community Bug Reporting System
5 Likes
Really more a suggestion, but i mean its not impossible^^
Eh, tbf it should’ve been on the vehicle given its BR and other Swedish vehicles. Im still wondering why the USH are both using the WW2 camos instead the more modern esq ones.
Same with a lot of the Finnish tanks using Swedish camos instead of their actual camos.
1 Like
The Ush’s are using those camos due to there being a lack of anything else other than the plain camo excisting. And due to the automatic camo adaptation when a vehicle is added to the tier with little info, as with most swedish vehicles. To cover for the fact the devs simply just re-use the traditional camo pattern from the game…
Should just give the USH yhe camos that it would’ve used like the ones found on most other cold war era Swedish vehicles imo
I’m wondering if it’s worth doing suggestions on the Landsverk L-180 and its variants. There’s like… 8(?) unique variants that could be suggested, if you count exports and Nordic variants. They would all be around 1.0 BR, but very interesting nonetheless.
3 Likes
Eh, im gonna go ahead and ruin it for you but gaijin rarely adds 1.0 vehicles as some nations “have enough” as stated by Smin when i asked for some low BR finnish air additions which would be 1.0 worthy. Itd be cool but i dont think we’d see them. I could always be wrong and id like to be wrong on this.
1 Like
There’s a lot of camos that should be added into the game. I kind of hope they would do a focus update on that and I bet it wouldn’t even be that difficult since it’s just an overlay.
We’d need more people to do bug reports or suggestions for them then, we dont have many swedish people doing bug reports or suggestions in general, if anything its the smallest community of all the nations which is a bit crazy to me.