DU is not pure Uranium-238, its around 40-65% so the real statistics should be similar to tungsten. The DU is supposed to be incored into the ceramics layer, like how they make nuclear fuel putting UO2 into ceramics.
1 Like
/facepalm The BRL started modifying and increasing the Hull of the Abrams in 1988, and then there is the out right statment from the stating all Abrams made after 1998 have D.U in their hulls from the government that regulates all D.U used in the military, then the bug reports proving there is D.U in the hull with actual SOURCES M1a2 SepV2 missing hull armor // Gaijin.net // Issues
NO the spall liner is wedged between the plates, which is why if the abrams is ever penetrated, the only thing that will be made is a small hole , which has been seen in numerous pictures, and even on wiki leaks where a unknown projectile penetrate the side of a Abrams. No crew were killed.
this is the old way there are " newer " ways which is on the sep v2 / v3 abrams which i can’t talk about.
Genuinely cant believe im having to bring back this image
SPALL LINERS CANNOT EXIST BETWEEN ARMOUR PLATES IT DOESNT MAKE SENSE
3 Likes
There isn’t a physical blanket in the armour array. The composite itself is made of materials that produce less spall. It won’t provide the same spall protection that a blanket liner does.
These are made up numbers, just to show an example
No SL: 45° Spall Angle
Integrated SL: 35° Spall Angle
Blanket SL: 15° Spall Angle
1 Like
The DU is used like net is what I’ve heard any secretive info on that? :)
1 Like
Oh you’re one of those guys
2 Likes
This literally isn’t possible if the interior is RHA.
Any spall reduction during shell travel would be negated by it… hitting regular RHA at the end.
Unless you mean to imply that the interior of the Abrams is also Depleted Uranium, and that it would spall Depleted Uranium when penetrated? Wouldn’t that be dangerous, considering shells made out of it should set everything on fire and basically kill everything instantly, apparently:
Additionally, why are you ONCE AGAIN constantly talking about the Abrams/NATO vehicles without any mention or any attempt to actually discuss the ZTZ-99A’s armor?
This is the " What do you think of the armor performance of ZTZ99A?" thread.
There’s no proof that an “intergrated spall liner” actually results in less spalling when penned by such a ridiculously high energy shell
1 Like
>Come into ZTZ 99A thread
>America mains crawl out of the woodwork to bitch about the abrams for some reason
Every day, forever, until the heat death of the universe
9 Likes
Everytime
1 Like
What else does integrated spall liner mean then?
Your graphic shows that a blanket spall liner doesn’t make sense if its in the armour array and there is no blankets in the crew compartments.
@SneedSellsFeed I’m not here to argue whats possible or not, please don’t put assumptions in my mouth.
My graphic was to show the misconception about Integrated spall liner that Sartt and Nano fight over.
1 Like
How can it show a misconception if it’s an impossibility?
I genuinely don’t know what to even reply to this with its genuinely stupid
I think Chinese tanks SUCK
whaaaat?! DDD:
Yeah, they currently indeed do in-game.
I’m banking on them fixing the issues I described here:
1 Like
/s :)
Sartt said “Spall Liner is wedged between the plates”
That doesn’t make sense, as Nano has shown in his graphic. How can a spall liner in the armour array catch spall from the plates that it is in front of. Nano’s art shows this doesn’t make sense. IF SOMEHOW the abrams does have a integrated SL then it would be closer to how my graphic showed its protection.
Maybe I should have stated it in my original messages, the reason why specifically pointed out the Abrams and Merkava as they currently have the bug report open on Integrated Spall Liners, in case those reports were referenced. I would need to go read that research more on those and there sources.
My intent wasn’t to come here a join the shit spewing that is “MuH AbRaMs SpAlL LiNeR” so I apologize if it came off that way.