What can save American top tier air?

120D still doesn’t have a significantly higher Pk against multipathing, they just dive into the ground like C-5
That’s when it goes active and my radar updating DL.

The so-called energy retention is achieved by extra 1kg maybe?

One thing I do find different is that you can kill airborne helos with DL. I managed to kill Z-10ME and Mi28NM several times with that trick.
It’s probably the GNSS doing its job cuz seeker never goes active during flight and even till hit, on the other hand, those helos seldom change their position.

Really? Will try that next time i play GRB since it would be much safer to do so then trying to kill them with guns

It sometimes misses out when they suddenly accelerate and you need to launch another shot.

1 Like



In this case seeker lost track due to chaff or mp but managed to hit in IOG+DL
DK if this is feasible with C-5

1 Like

I’m sorry, but what the fuck is this question ? Save ? I can’t speak… Like it is one of the most diversified toptier nation in toptier air, if not the best. It’s toptier F&F are very competitive, the suspended armament to farm ground tagets, the number of missiles, … I mean te F15E is maybe not the best dogfighter, but it still is extremly good in BVR.
Please comare it to Japan, Ok they have a Su-30 but it is just the same as the Venezuelian su-30 that sits at 13.3 with Kh38-MT that only will be used in GRB, but Japan itself only have the F-2 and F15J(M) that I don’t consider toptier anymore. AAM-4 badly modelled, and the AAm-3 seeker as well, no AAM-4B,…
i hope AAM-4B will be good when t will go out; I don’t want Gaijin to release it too late to be good like they did with the F-2.

Well technically Australia isn’t a sub tree and was never confirmed as one.

Lets not get ahead of ourselves here, Comet may well be a European export success, and other Eurofighter and Rafale customers will be interested.

No the fuck it is not the same???
The japanese MKM has a PESA radar thrust vectoring a better RWR and a MAWS/LWS system
It has a better missile aswell in the form of the RVV-SD Which is literally just an export R-77-1
Also gets access to the damocles pod which is a VERY good TGP when paired with the KH-38MT
Its basically a slightly better SU-30SM
Like i dont think you understand how much of an improvement everything i just listed there is

While the venezuelian SU-30 has no thrust vectoring a vastly worse mechanical radar No MAWS/LWS and a older RWR no TGP or KH-38MT And its best AAM is the RVV-AE Just an export R-77 that is quite well behind the R-77-1

Like i almost wonder if you even have flown the japanese SU-30 it easily can compete at toptier and is sure as hell better than the F-15E that is stuck with Aim-120A/B and C-5 with a pretty ass mechanical radar after all ive flown both aircraft and definitely prefer the MKM
Also the MKM not only has more missiles than the F-15E with a whopping 14 total it also gets some of the best in the game only being 2nd to the Mica

2 Likes

First of all, this topic was created back in 25th december 2025 when US did struggle and it has gotten alot better since then thanks to MCM.

Yes lets compare it with Japan now. While Japan might be suffering now, but in future (In 2026 itself) this most likely won’t be the case at all

I am pretty sure AAM-4 is considered better then AMRAAM and AAM-3 uses the same seeker as 9M

Ah yes the very competitive F$F maverick and AGM-84H, So competitive that out of 6 mavericks launched, chance of getting even 4 kill sometimes very low and AGM-84H which does kill if it does not lose the target very easily,

I might be blind, Please encircle exactly where is KH-38MT in loadout of Venezuelan SSU-30

Most diversified you say? Let compare them including future jets
US: F-16C/CM/ADF, F-15C MISP II/GE/A/EX, F-15E, F-14A/B, F-18A/C late, AV-8B+, F-18E, F-22, F-35A/B/C. I think i have covered everything
Japan:

  1. Japanese jets: F-16A, F-15J/JM and F-2A, F-35
  2. Thailand: F-16A OCU, Gripen-C/E (E has been order and is expected to be delivered between 2030 and 2025)
  3. Malaysia: SU-30MKM, F-18D, Mig-29N, T-50
  4. Indonesia Rafale, SU-30, SU-27, F-16C/D, KF-21 (KF-21 and has been ordered by not received, KF-21 is supposed to be delivered soon)

That’s basically on jet from every nation (except form China and Israel)
The only thing that i see Japan missing now is the EFT but i am sure there must be someother sub tree from where japan would also get

I see so much suffering for Japan

2 Likes

I could have sworn one of those nations were looking into buying a J series aircraft of some sort
Likely J-10C or JF-17
Unless was it cancelled?

Good ragebate

Ah yes, I forgot about them too. Indonesia is currently in talks to acquire J-17. As for J-10C, Indonesia have said that they will acquire them

Also potentially SU-57 as well if Malaysia does decide to buy it

And probably su-57e…

This is the first im hearing of this
Insane if they end up doing it though japan is gonna end up turning into a best hits nation for air

You’re trying to use my point about Lockheed to erase national origin, but you’re missing the core distinction between integration and engineering.

The Leopard 2AV is in the German tree because it is a German National Product. As the War Thunder Wiki states, it is an “experimental German main battle tank” and a direct evolution of the German Leopard 2K project. Krauss-Maffei didn’t build it as a private hobby; they built it using German state funding and German engineering IP. In War Thunder, a “nation” is just the label for that country’s defence industrial base. If “Krauss-Maffei building it” doesn’t count as Germany, then “Chrysler building the Abrams” doesn’t count as the US, and the whole tech tree system collapses.

My point about Lockheed and the Meteor is that testing is just a job. Lockheed acting as the “IT guy” to make a European missile (Meteor) talk to a US plane (F-35) doesn’t transfer the “Title Deed” of that missile’s design to the US government.

You can’t have it both ways:

  1. If the Leopard 2AV belongs to Germany because they designed and own the IP (despite testing it in the US), then the Meteor remains European (despite being integrated by Lockheed).
  2. If you truly believe “Testing = Ownership,” then the US tree should also have the Leclerc, Challenger 2, and every Soviet tank ever trialled at Aberdeen.

The 2AV is the literal bridge between the Leopard 1 and 2. Putting it in the US tree because it went on a “business trip” to Maryland in 1976 makes as much sense as putting a BMW in the US tree because it passed a California emissions test. One is a location of a trial, the other is the origin of the soul of the machine.

I dont think every plane they order is gonna end up in their TT(japan), since there would be no reason to play other air TT’s if they end up getting like every 5th gen and 4.5 gen

But still most of them would, especially Indonesian jets such as Rafale and SU-30/27 which would be added once they finally add Indonesian subtree. Jets like Gripen E has still lower chance though. (However if it is added then that completely destroys the point of grinding Swedish air tree IMO).

1 Like

Them adding the rafale would also kinda cuck the french tree as they operate the f.4 standard which is almost what we have ingame leaving them with only the ordered F.5, while japan also has these other jets.

Reinforces my point that adding all of them would just drastically reduce the incentive to grind other TT’s

Lets be real adding any of these jets will cuck the operator nation
Unfortunately i have a feeling gajin will be forced to add the rafale at some point just due to how meta defining it is
Dont get me wrong the SU-30MKM is good too but thats about the only top tier jet japan has right now that is competitive in the current meta Its an unfortunate result of japan having very few domestic aircraft