Eh… if they truly intend such radically different performance vehicles to the same BR then this entire thread is pointless and we might as well just wait for the death of the game. Like there is no way the FA2 and F3 Late are equal in performance currently and the Premium Su-30s are only 0.3 better.
Its just gaijin has compressed themselves into a complete and utter mess
So what you’re asserting is that the F-15C and Su-30SM2 don’t climb and gain speed similarly in the AirRB gameplay loop?
Not once was milpower used in this video. You’re problem in this discussion is misrepresenting things. Even things I let you have lol.
You contradicted yourself.
There’s no counterpoint. I was making a comment not even towards you necessarily. Do you know what the topic is here?
Okay, so #1, this is borderline schizo. Never did I have this back and forth with you…
#2 Gaijin really isn’t that great at modeling stuff man. It’s basically all an illusion. They really don’t have a clue for most things they do especially balance-wise.
Can’t believe I have to explain this to someone that apparently plays the same game I do… Players always spawn in front of you. BVR only happens at the start of the game. Players only spawn at the start of the game.
You take the substance out of my arguments and spin up your own. You don’t see any contradictions because you maliciously or accidentally break down my points, take away context or integral info, and then present it as something else? Whatever you do it’s weird man.
Your proposed changes would do little to help American top tier air. Everybody knows that the real reason amraams suck is they have the worst turn off the rail of any ARH missile nor do they have a particularly fast time to impact at close range. Your proposed changes aren’t nothing, but the most you can do is kill the single father of 5 that just came back from their 12-hour shift a little further away than before because they have no idea how to notch.
Are there any sources that would point to better close-range turn for the amraam?
I think the best sources Flame/Gunjob have for it actually show the current modeling for it off the rails is actually probably right.
But there is likely issues with the overall AoA of the missile that needs correcting but sourcing is hard.
Known reports are:
There are other issues like the LSZ being displayed wrong too, which is actually quite major but seems to affect everyone at the moment.
Quite frankly I’m not continuing this seeing as you have devolved it into attacking me, rather than engaging with me in discussion. I hope you have good day and or night, i know i will.
Could copy and paste the same message to you. Cheers.
I did not have MAWS. At least the American variant
With all the updates F-22 has been getting wouldn’t it be doing the same?
the early ones did have MAWS shortly, and the MAWS bumps are still there
But they removed it later. I doubt it gaijin will give it
could just get maws based off compatibility anyway
The point was the F22 using it’s radar to locate the typhoon. Pinging the typhoons RWR and then display the exact position of the F22 in the HMD
surely f-22 also has this ability with scorpion? same hmd as rafale
I don’t know.
But the point is the F22 is stealth and apparently totally and completely invisible meanwhile the Typhoon is not
If i am not mistaken even JHMCS II have this feature
yeah it does but f-22 doesnt use jhmcs 2 it uses scorpion
(from scorpion ad so its not actual symbology but point is there)
But it won’t be able to track it right? It would just reveal its position. A good F-22 pilot can turn on his radar fire and the turn it off. With plane to plane data link which i assume would be added before 5th gen, missile launched by F-22 can be directed by other plane
Well atleast F-16V and F-15EX would also have this feature since they use JHMCS II and are likely to come before 5th gen
Well, if he does that, then the missile is really easy to defeat and basically a waste of a missile, but half the challenge with stealth is locating it in the first place. Now I know the rough area to be pointing both my AESA and IRST into and also where I need to be defending from. Which destroys half the advantage the F22 had.
And I doubt plane to plane DL would be added
So for the entire match you would just focus on a single F-22? If if you remove its stealth which is its big advantage it would still be a good 4.5 gen with all upgrades it has. It still won’t be bad. It would only be missing gimble radar
If they are planning on adding 5th gen, then they must surely be planning on adding it
I guess this is one advantage the Rafale has over the EFT. If the F-22 pings the Rafale’s RWR, the RWR can slew the TV sensor to the F-22 with its laser, and then from there the Rafale can actively track the F-22 even if the F-22 shut off its radar, and then the Rafale can fire missiles through the TV/Laser.
Rafale’s TV sensor should be cued by its passive sensors. // Gaijin.net // Issues
Rafale TV sensor should provide firing capability for MICA-EM // Gaijin.net // Issues
For the EFT, it can get the location of the F-22 through the RWR, but once the radar is shut off, it’s basically unable to actively guide any missiles.