What are some vehicles you guy's believe should/could get their historical weapon's at this point in time?

I guarantee I understand the F-15s flight control system better than you ever will.

This was just a fit check on the ground, never flew. And the AMBER racks for CFTs have not been purchased.

They are not centerline, they are CFT mounted.

1 Like

X

This is the standard for this game. In fact, its more than adequate for this game. As its more than a number of in game implements have had IRL.

They are centerline positions and we have CFTs on the F15C MSIP II so its good enough for this games standards.

Being purchased has never been the standard for this game, especially for the USSR tree.


I find it amazing how much gate keeping and how much higher bar is required for one nation vs others. Weapons that the Mig 29 can’t carry = good to go. Weapons that were never even test fit on the Yak 141 = good to go. Weapons we know can be mounted = not good enough… Really silly. Tanks without their optimum munitions on one nation while ERA that is god like over performing on another = good to go.

AH-1Z Viper Attack Helicopter

  • The AH-1Z is an attack Helicopter that’s been using the AGM-114B Hellfire which was well out of service by the time the helicopter was introduced in September, 2010.

  • AGM-179 Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM)
  • AGM-114L Hellfire LongBow
  • AGM-114K Hellfire (At the minimum.)
  • AGM-114N Hellfire
  • AGM-114R Hellfire II
  • AIM-9X Sidewinder Blk. 2 (Later on when further aircraft/ordnance is added.)
  • Cobra Radar System Pod
4 Likes

I’m not gatekeeping. I want US jets and the F-15s specifically represented correctly, not some fantasy what-if design.

Spoiler

Just a few that I have collected while working to decorate my man-cave

4 Likes

DocUSMC’s posts contain too much fake… just too much…

1 Like

I haven’t really bothered. I won’t give away what we do, but I live next to and work with Lockheed, Grumman, Bell, L3, Raytheon, Wilcox, Garmin and many others here in DFW, as well as I am retired military. I have boxes of this stuff, not sure if I will ever get around to wall hanging. The hats alone would need a wall to themselves I just don’t have the motivation to do. But here is one from the F35 project here in Fort Worth.

1 Like

Really need some AGM-114L ‘Longbows’ for the Apache and Viper. Yeah it gets a lot of them but there are still ways to mitigate the missile i.e. cover and if it’s a situation that cover isn’t available, get aircraft/SPAA up to kill the helicopter. I’m aware it can duck behind cover after firing its payload but it’s essentially going to behave like how all other fire-and-forget aircraft/helicopter weapons have with the exception of it being able to go through smoke and that is if the guidance remains reliable to kill the target (seeing how current Spike-LR, PARS-3, and other missiles are currently implemented).


Also the SHARD APFSDS-T round for the Leclerc SXXI and the future Leclerc XLR.

Spike should be revorked and be 100% resistant to Arena and Stora. Also a gunner skill based precentage hit chance at center mass. It is after all a remote controlled ATGM and the input is done by fiber wiere not by laser or radio comand. If the players cant guide it in then make a abrivration by letting the gunner of tank guide the weapon in.

2 Likes


Tracking RADAR for the French Roland launcher or at least the full Roland 3 system:

2 Likes

R77/27 on su39.

People seem to be not happy with the BR increase, but I dont understand how it would be worse with a BVR kit, its a shit airframe at 11.7 with dogfight IR missles. No one dies to this unless they are bad. Having a shit airframe doesnt matter as much in BVR (AS MUCH).

1 Like

I’ll give you my stats that I know of RB28 on the J35F

It had an All Aspect range of just under 3km
It was Mach 3< capable tho usually around Mach 2.75-3.0 on the deck
About 11km or more range
The G pull is around 30-35G
And it in fact had a proxy
Issues were it’s lack of quick usability as it took like 30 seconds to turn on, it’s short life time and how it’d be dead weight if turned on and not fired nearly immediately
But a lot of the American problems were removed or solved very early into service
The seeker track rate is not known

But a scenario given by the Swedish authorities gave the performance of RB28 as:
Firing aircraft Mach 1.14 at 9km alt
Target aircraft Mach 1.48 at 10km alt
In a HK turn the RB28 flew 9km in 6 seconds reaching mach 3

Don’t know how far away the J35 was when firing it but I assume at least 4km away or more

Edit: side aspect HK turn at 100° to the side of the aircraft and 5km out

1 Like

Jesus that aint too bad.

Give or take 10G lower tbh
Hard to tell with almost no info

Idk if this is a weapon as much as its a weapon assist, But i Want the J32 Lansen to have its Radar Gun Sight And Infrared Gun Sight-

3 Likes

I assume unless modelled accurately as it was irl, it’ll be as useless as the viggens

Apache D US JP ISRAEL
AH MK1

I know it’s not possible but damn i want APDS or APFSDS for the beglietpanzer. maybe even target tracking. but the begliet is already goated, if apfsds and target tracking is added it would just become a significantly better 2s38 but in german main hands

Just wait till they add a 2S38 like vehicle that has kornets

1 Like
  • AGM-114L ‘Longbow’ MMW missiles for the AH-64D (US/IL), AH-1Z, AH Mk. 1, and AH-64DJP.
  • BA-21 (AKD-21) MMW missiles for Z-10(ME-02).
2 Likes

and you can bet that the kornet will have actually accurate trajectories and will be actually usable unlike the western Spike missiles and such… you know, gaijin magic

1 Like