Even a 2s38 can pen all those areas except for the LFP, what tank are you using?
The LFP of any T-series is smaller than the gap between the turret cheeks and the upper front plate of the Abrams.
I could be wrong since I don’t pay attention to Abrams stuff anymore, but I’m like 85% sure it’s not realistic, and is not where it should be and has bug reports already made on it. Which is why someone feels it happens more on the Abrams than their other tanks… because it does.
If you have trouble hitting them, try lrf every time and aim directly at the spot and lead if necessary, you will have a much higher probability of hitting the sweet spot, if you can’t hit them in CQC then that is definitely skill issue lol
My bvm hadn’t bounce any shots, if I don’t die I either get breech every time I got hit, which means disabled, no idea how USA mains think it is any easier to do well in them.
1 Like
People staying out of Abrams threads “to clog it up with irrelevant points to the topic at hand”-challenge …
impossible.
2 Likes
I generally don’t have much trouble personally with T series that are out in the open. It’s the hull down players I do have trouble with. Then again I don’t play Abrams nearly as much as the HSTVL. I generally have trouble with side shots being bounced by ERA. Spall liners on the T90s and Leos
Dude you were literally just crying about not penning an Abrams, which can be penned by even gepards. Idk where you got those screenshots from, that’s why I was asking what tank you were using
Says the guy crying in here completely unrelated to the topic at hand.
Cute :)
4 Likes
Someone brought up the pump thing which is an added module to make Abrams having “more things to go wrong”, which play it off as if only Abrams receive such an update, then he brought up the T-series also received a damageable part similar to Abrams which is the autoloader now has a hit box that can be damaged when hit, technically both receive nerfing since more modules means more things to go wrong, which is a reasonable response to someone who brought up similar thing?
1 Like
To my understanding of the thread so far, someone brought up the Abrams hydraulic pump seemingly getting hit more often than his experience in others.
Which to my memory, is true, it’s an incorrectly modeled module which seemingly does affect Abrams more often than others. There’s a bug report that I thought was accepted, but maybe not, but I’m sure exists detailing why it’s I correctly modeled leading to the exact problems OP described.
Bringing up T series stuff is irrelevant and off topic. It’s essentially just crying in an Abrams thread. Which is where my sarcasm came from.
This is not even touching on the fact that the autoloader module was a simultaneous buff and nerf it was a net neutral addition. It added armor and essentially a spall liner to the carousel that often enough saves it from detonating. Whereas the hydraulic module is only a nerf. This is neither here nor there though, because it’s just off topic it’s an Abrams problem thread. I know US people do it too in Russian threads and it Should be addressed as such as well(I’m guilty of this as well sometimes).
2 Likes
Well, that explains so much.
I’d noticed the horizontal drive getting knocked out with alarming regularity on the abrams.
Seems like the kind of thing that should be fixed fairly urgently.
2 Likes
Buddy the topic is about the “Abrams” having real issues, this has nothing to do with reload, reverse speed.
If you would like to complain about the pathetic russian transmission you can go ahead and create a topic but that wouldn’t change anything since that’s how it is in real life.
1 Like
im not seeing the issue here. Challenger and abrams both have a major weakspot which exposes the turret ring to spall or the projectile itself
If you read the post, you would know that the OP was pointing out that the Abrams’ turret ring gets knocked basically wherever you hit it because of the hydraulic pump, not just when you hit the turret ring.
1 Like
look at where the pump is, its gonna eat a load of spall from a hull hit. Im not seeing the issue with components being knocked out when hit
The issue is that irl knocking out the pump would not knock out the drive, at least if what was presented in the bug report is true.
it should only limit to slower manual traverse but gaijin seems incapable of such things
Iirc, the big pump thing in game is a reservoir/backup so it wouldn’t even make it go into manual drive
4 Likes
The pump irl is at the engine. What’s modelled ingame is the backup.
2 Likes
Gajin aint fixing for another year for sure
Same with the turret ring and the entire fp of the abrams missing armor
Also the fp of the m1/m1a1/imp1/hc/aim have completely different material use and layout from the a2/sep but gajin obviously doesnt believe it
They making bank from the clickbait and kvt they aint stopping