I think you have been fed a little bit too much abrams propaganda, the SEP V2 with a DU LFP addon would just scrape it equal to the Leopards, and nothing would be broken about them since the same doctrinal issues still stand of a colossal breach, massive turret neck and easily disable-able gun. The only way to make the abrams perform how you act it does is to give it 10,000mm of RHA on every crevice and plate, only then will the abrams perform like the propaganda suggests
2 Likes
Laser rangefinders and fire control systems would be a massive change over 5.7 but go off
1 Like
Everything I said was historical, nothing ahistorical at all about my arguments.
These aren’t doctrinal issues, the breech on the Abrams should be sufficient to stop our current Sabot - same as the turret cheek armor. The M1A1 and such underperforms in that regard. The Leopards over perform.
Fix the ballistics, game becomes much more difficult for your average point and clicker.
Got sufficient evidence for this?
So russian tanks become unplayable, the ariete remains just as bad, the Leopard and Abrams get to be the best all around, challenger has the best armour, type 10 gets the best reload, everyone else is somewhere in between.
Doesn’t sound too bad tbf
1 Like
Welp i’m kind of wish that Gaijin take GHPC tank combat gameplay as an example and put them in this game.
-proper big map , -better Objective such as push enemy out of the area , search and destroy , etc (not just “capture the circle” we have in game atm) , -Tank commander who actually help you spot and pin-point targets for you .
Don’t piggy back off my comments if you’re going to spout nonsense.
That would be horrid.
Absolutely.
Better engine doesn’t mean it’s faster.
The constant torque and better transmission makes it far more mobile irl by comparison
I don’t disagree just stating horsepower means relatively little. It’s how the power is applied and how much weight it’s moving. 250hp motorcycles beat million dollar cars in straight lines.
Agreed.
I didn’t mention horsepower, motorcycles have no torque.
Also, what does it matter? I said it is more mobile not faster. A bike isn’t cornering harder than some million dollar hypercars and certainly not better than a forklift.
I said it’s more mobile and explained how as simply as possible.
I wasn’t even talking to you in the first place, so idk what you’re getting defensive over or trying to argue for. Your original response has nothing to do with what I said, nor was it even regarding you
Since you need your hand held to follow a conversation.
So I repeat, I wasn’t talking to you and it had nothing to do with what I said.
Not that they should copy GHPC as a whole. But with a proper map , better objective and function tank commander would certainly improve War thunder gameplay.
Moreso how the power is converted, folks seem to forget that torque is quite a ways more important for moving the likes of a MBT, along with the efficiency of the final drive itself.
This is in part why the likes of the Type 10 IRL, even though it sports a far lower total HP when compared to current MBTs is exceptionally nimble as it’s engine puts down torque like its going out of style. The AGT1500 and it’s associated transmission also puts down torque extremely efficiently when compared to other MBTs, especially after the mid life tweaks made to the powerpack in the modern age.
Gaijin still models transmissions like WW2 era ones so they seldom live up to the actual quality that modern offerings should have.
2 Likes
because gaijin is full of incompetent devs who for some unforeseeable reason has no idea how abrams are made or function.
Oh, I’m sure they know. They just don’t want to fix it.
1 Like