I understand that Gaijin’s developers are incapable of creating good maps, but as the game ages and more and more garbage maps are introduced, it would only be logical to allow us to ban more maps as well.
7 Likes
Bonus, if not banning maps, we need a magic button, what eliminates 1cap maps completely from 10.0 →
And banning would be easy to deal.
Non premium players get 1 map
Premium players get 2 maps.
2 Likes
Don’t give Gaijin ideas to make a Premium+ subscription that allows up to 5 map bans xD. Anyways, I don’t think this is happening because then people with Premium would just ban all the trash maps (like Pradesh, Red Desert, Fulda, Breslau, Fields of Poland…) and there would just be a significantly smaller pool of maps left for the matchmaker to choose from. Not to mention that the queue times would probably increase, especially at higher BRs since the matchmaker would have to account for everyone’s map bans. It would be a good feature, but I doubt Gaijin would ever implement something like this.
Sounds good. More likes and dislikes, and a few more bans. Some maps have like three variants, so for premium time players I say 3 bans is a minimum.
But maybe community wise, let people add more likes to stay on the positive side. Let people boost their 10-20 favorite maps. Then as a community we get to play more the maps we enjoy more. Although it might have changes and likes and dislikes are not working anymore. Does anyone know?
Weird way to spell “Sw*den”.
1 Like
Poland mentioned 💪💪💪
i agree… if can ban 3 maps
they say Improvements maps make better but u can see… make it worse… 1 side can spawn camping, 1 side can easy kill helicopter(heli af), etc
Don’t get me started on that map… hate the rat tanks there
In air battles, I absolutely hate the color palette of the Spain map; the yellow tone makes it difficult to see tracer fire clearly. Even though I’ve marked it with a ‘dislike,’ it still shows up constantly—in fact, I’d guess it’s the map I end up playing most often throughout the day.
As for the Falkland Islands map, I don’t like that one either; it feels poorly laid out and way too long.
When it comes to ground (tank) battles, don’t even get me started. If I could ban 10 maps, I’d be thrilled—Sicily, Vietnam, Ash River (at BRs above 5.0), Eastern Europe, Poland (at high BRs)… there’s a whole list of maps I’d get rid of entirely. Honestly, I’d be happy just having 3 actual bans. The current ‘dislike’ system doesn’t work at all; they might as well just remove the option from the game, as it’s completely irrelevant.
…weird way to spell Sweden.
‘‘Sweden’’… weird way to spell Br*slau
I use it as a pejorative.
I hate its existence in general. The worst map to ever exist in WT.
European provinence, that large scale is completely banned.
And another what I would ban is either firearc , or that new Darwin award, I mean Darwin Hill
Whats wrong with it?
too open map with a lot of sniping spots that can even see into your spawn.
Pyrenees for early jets… baned…
I find darwin hill to be actually somewhat balanced. lot of cover and flanking routes as well, entering the open area is solely player choice as opposed to being forced into it, and havent had issues with sniping into the spawn.
Could be, but I have had bad experiences with it.
just a flat completely open map.
No place to hide an AA , and just CAS fest map.
It reminds me more of “can we make even worse fire arc” " Hold my beer"
Northern spawn is a bit better for AA players but not by much.
Bonus points on spawn sniping.