Hello im a War Thunder player myself and i just wanted to point out some inaccurate things on the F-16C Block 50. So in real life the F-16CM Bl. 50/52 has an AESA radar. And there is some more innacuracies, like the AIM-120C not being able to be carried ingame, + the AIM-9’s are on the WRONG pylon. In real life the F-16’s carry the LAU-128 pylons for EVERY missile they carry, and i have proof for this, which at this moment we can only carry AIM-120A and AIM-9L/M, which IRL is far beyond that with the AIM-120A/B/C/D, AIM-9L/M/X, heres proof for the missile pylons.
This is a photo i took myself, as i spot F-16CM Block 52’s irl. In addition to this the F-16’s ingame carry the wrong Bomb Pylons and the Wrong Triple Ejector pylons. Ingame the F-16 uses this pylon
And in real life they use this pylon for bombs
And then they made it carry the WRONG Triple Ejector Rack, ingame it carries what i believe is the TR-9A
But in real life it carries the BRU-33D Triple Ejector Rack. Which looks like this
I find it crazy how Gaijin adds something and everybody wants/likes it but never knows any facts about it. Im so dissappointed that they couldnt do their research and figure these things out so simply. Im also 14 by the way so, im sorry to say this gaijin but if im smarter than you for this theres a problem here. Fix this immediately please, it would be nice to have a REALISTIC jet for once. In addition to realism. The ONLY realistic pylons you gave an F-15 ingame is the F-15C Golden Eagle. With the correct missile pylons. The LAU-128. And im saying this for a reason, NO AMERICAN F-15 IN HISTORY. EVER. Has carried LAU-7 pylons like the F-15E and F-15C MSIP do. THEY ALL CARRY LAU-128. NOT LAU-7, the israeli F-15I’s do. Please fix this stuff😭
If it ONLY carried AESA, then it will need a bug report, if it could carry AESA, but also carried M-Scan it will be a choice by Gaijin. Likely expect an AESA F-16 sometime this year
Loadouts are always a balancing decision, there are many aircraft that could carry different missiles but dont in-game as to maintain a certain BR.
Though in this, you are probably better off without. C5s are largely a side-grade at best, but just look at the F-16I, at 14.0 for no apparent reason other than the C5s.
As for this, I challenge you to find a vehicle in-game without a huge list of inaccuracies. Harriers for example need deleting and starting again they have so many things wrong with them.
In reply to this. It shouldnt be a problem that im 14 playing this, i have been playing since i was 11. And that there are plenty of way younger kids than me. Theres hundreds or even thousands of kids under the age of 10 playing this game.
I do agree some vehicles are accurate, and some arent at all. For instance the Harriers ingame aren’t able to carry drop tanks like they are able to in real life. But with the F-15’s. They dont have much wrong accept the missile pylons and that the F-15E doesnt have a FLIR pod yet.
WT is a 16+ game but other than gambling crates (son dont get into gambling it is a slow working poison) i dont see why. so keep that hush or come back in two years.
also welcome to the not very exclusive club of people that spot several inaccuracies in how gaijin modelled vehicles. Off the top of my head i could ramble for a solid hour on whats wrong on vehicles lol
I mean id be happier if my future children played a WT style game over a GTA just from the internal content being relatively neutral beyond being vehicle warfare. Parents should be monitoring this kids game library so id take that as a “yes im ok with my son playing this game”
“It shouldnt be a problem that im stealing things, ive been stealing things for years now. Besides theres plenty of other thieves around, hundred of thousands of thieves are around and stealing”
Yes, sure that form of logic works out well for you.
Comparing real life crimes to breaking the rules on a digital video game lol. We all played shit we shouldn’t have as kids or teenagers.
This game features zero violence, and what teenager wouldn’t fall in love with tanks and planes? So lame, it’s like telling a kid not to play with toy soldiers and tanks. We all broke rules to play things we shouldn’t have at some point, it doesn’t make right it in some cases but a 14 year old playing this game is like the less egregious shit that could ever happen.
The fact that you completely missed the point doesnt surprise me. The point was that him defending it using the argument of “theres plenty others doing it” is dumb.
Visual violence or not, the games ToS says that its not for 14 year olds and while everyone has probably played an 18+ game as an under aged kid before, it takes a special dumbass to actively and openly admit it on the official forum of the game.
