I can’t say much about proposed changes to top tier, but for the rest of it seems mostly good suggestions.
Which is why Gaijin is not gonna implement them, lol.
It’s funny how some of these are really good and the others are batshit crazy.
4 Likes
improvements
1.gayjin nurf russia even more
2.gayjin hand hold the us even more
1 Like
Lmao
Lmao
Lmao
Lmao
2 Likes
Spoiler
1- I’ve supported changing arcade battles to be more arcadey with ground-only for a while. No objections.
2- No. This is a valid technique to deal with daily and special tasks involving getting frags of 1.0+ BR above you. On top of a valid technique of getting God Mode without a squad.
3- Dunno about this one.
4- They’re working on this, and it requires the AI overhaul they’re also working on at the same time.
5- No. This suggestion is anti-consumer.
6- No? Get backups from the Battlepass…
7- There already are some… also no?
8- Not possible without moving ALL 11.0 helicopters up to 11.3, and ALL 11.3 helicopters up to 11.7.
9- No.
10- Sure, alongside T-14, 2A8, etc.
Clickbait is balanced at 11.3, moving that down to 11.0 is like moving the BVM down to 11.0. IPM1 and M1A1 are fine at 11.0. France’s M1A1 equivalent tank is 11.7 currently.
11- HSTVL buffs would make it 11.7 - 12.3. Also: Historical report.
12- No?
13- Would be the same pen as F1. SHARD should be added, and added to other tech trees like Japan as well. Using the compatibility of RH-120 derivative guns.
14- Merkava possibly. Dunno about Ariete.
15- That’s a historical report issue.
16- No. You already have 30 seconds of immortality at spawn.
17- Challenger reload is already buffed to 5 seconds.
18- Not possible at this time, on top of no aircraft in Britain to use them.
19- Historical report.
20- Historical report.
21- No. This is required for Steam achievements and fine.
22- This is just you repeating #1 but for sim battles… you want sim to be arcade? No.
23- Nah. Decompress instead.
24- Historical report.
25- Historical report.
26- Along with Strf 9040C sure…
27- What?
28- Yeah.
29- Already was moved, its still the weakest damage model in the game.
30- ? No objections.
31- No? Come up with a better idea for my support.
32- Dunno about this one.
B-side:
1- Premium SPAA isn’t necessary.
2- No, hard no.
3- Maybe…
4- NO!
5- No. [Legal trouble if they allow this.]
6- ? No opinion.
7- ? Leaning on no.
8- NO AUCTIONS!
9- No…
10- ? No opinion.
11- Not possible without removing the ability for all squad members to have a banned map, which would be a nerf for 4 squad members.
Cause you’d go from 4 bans to 2 when playing with 3 other people.
That is my critique of your post.
This critique is not a defense of anything not contained in this post.
2 Likes
Thing is that they have more than enough players and monetization options that you don’t have to nickle and dime players and make the game miserable half the time.
1 Like
LOL, LMAO even.
4 Likes
I dont care for the rest of what you said but get out of here with putting ads in this game. this isn’t a crappy mobile game GTFO
3 Likes
- Eh, it isn’t needed
- No
- Sure
- No opinion
- No
- Sure, it’ll help 1DL slightly
- 2S38, and no one would buy them
- lol
- wtf
- I don’t see many issues with that
- No
- Neutral
- Not by too much
- No, fuck helis
- I want less randomness in spawning, spawning facing a wall/rock is incredibly annoying
- Neutral
- Isn’t that already what happens?
- Why would you remove arty, that’s so dumb
- No
- Make a bug report
- moving it down in BR is fine with me
- It would be fine at 10.7
- Agreed
- Agreed
- No issues with me
- That makes prem time less desirable, so no. Just buff rewards instead of doing that
- Allow it to be sued with SL
Monetization:
0. WHY DO YOU WANT MORE MONETIZATION IN THIS GAME, theres already enough
- Already suggested, no one would buy it unless it can be used as a light tank
- Not needed
- Good idea
- Fuck no
- Don’t they already do that?
- More camo nets is good, limiting bushes that way can be done better
- No
- No
- This shouldn’t be a monetization feature
- Sure, but only if normal players get 1 map ban
All of these are good options, except for the ads that are strongly against this, they are really offensive, disgusting, and it will be the enemy of humanity if someone adds ads to the game.
Also, if these suggestions are played, it will make the game more beautiful.
Animation of the characters, for example, when they want to repair the tank, show a short and partial animation of the crew disembarking and the repair. Also, animations for tanks and anti-aircraft where you can see the crew, for example, panic and shake when they are shot, or bandage themselves if they are injured. These are the details that make the game very beautiful and different.
Also, some players sometimes like to be away from the competitive environment to chill and prefer PvE missions. At the moment, the current PvE missions are not interesting, but if more interesting campaigns are added to the game. It will be cool.
If it is possible to rent some golden units in the game with a lot of silver, for example, 200,000 silver per day, this will also be a good option.
You are absolutely right, this was the wierdest Suggestion i have ever read on the forum.
I am not paying 70 bucks a year for a premium account to see ads anywhere in the game.
2 Likes
Do you have documents that prove the buffs?
We should not change historical stats of vehicles just because they don’t do well in the game.
If a vehicle does not do well, it should always be moved down in BR, not have its stats artifically increased, thats not what a “realistic game” is.
1 Like
I would personally love if we could at least get an option for a Premium SPAA. Preferably upper-tier, and it would be an easy financial decision. Give us a special edition upper-tier SPAA, charge us $79.99 for it. It wouldn’t take long to put a few mini-upgrades in (even if it’s only maybe 5% faster reload time and a special skin). I believe even if they could not get a lot of people to buy it, even if they only sell 10 of them, that would pay for time and labor costs surely, if they only add a premium skin for it for sure. It’d give people like me a chance to play the one class we enjoy, without having to grind all the way up, and make an easy payday.
its not good for you but it makes gaijin money so they dont have to force monetization.
at least thats my idea.
would you rather pay or have ads?
huh? reload time is fictional made by gaijin to balance.
Really? Didnt know that, I always thought they habe them somewhat acurately modeled.
But I think you are right, considering the flak8,8 could be reloded quite fast in real life…
Merkava reload was worse than others for a while now because of “balance decisions”
same goes why Abrams got 5s ace now. fiction.
i dont mind though as long as its within reason
1 Like
“its not good for you”
It aint good for anyone.
My brother, they make an insane amount of money already. Why in the world would you want ADS for ANYTHING displayed in the main landing page of this game? Imagine a banner ad for like Genshin Impact, or some random Temu dropshipped product, that you’re FORCED to see. There are a million different ways for Gaijin to monetize this game without malicious interruptible ads.
Please share some ideas here for that, i suggested that because im realistic, they do want to earn money so just improving the game is little to now importance for them.
They have no need to change their current way of monetization.