I agree, the previous system had SOUL.
They should have just made the newest rank 8 tanks from the 2010s have a full resolution photo with no grain instead of this standardized slop.
1 Like
Thrust-to-weight Ratios on Planes would be a start
Because it was to much effort for them? They are now even using AI to make Profile Pictures of WW2 Heroes (very respectful) and other content on Maps
Sad to see the AI Trend - Takes the soul out of everything
1 Like
I mean anything that is actually useful.
Listing the main gun for jets that mostly rely on missiles is dumb.
Armament presets is a meaningless number.
One second burst mass is kinda pointless.
Crew… really?
Max speed at 10668m is irrelevant
Max altitude is irrelevant
Turn time… I don’t even know what that is based on as it doesn’t take 30 seconds to do anything.
Rate of climb, if that’s even accurate.
Takeoff run pointless.
What about actual features, how many hardpoints, does it get flares, does it get air brakes, what radar does it have, at what speed do wings break… like functional things.
Instead you have to x-ray the damn thing to showcase a bunch of information with zero explanation.
1 Like
Just look at this crap
And the current Event Profile Picture ‘honouring’ the WW2 Hero is also just AI generated
Generating the images is one thing, not caring enough to add readable text on AI generated images is lazier than lazy, yet I’m somehow not surprised.
Back in the ground forces beta testing, you had real world images for ground units. Even with some historical background information about the vehicles.
1 Like