Yeah it’s kinda annoying, considering the AN/APG-63 should have a normal TWS mode anyways, as it was added with PSP. However gaijin has refused to accept bug reports on it because we only have documents outlining what the PSP upgrade will be, not anything confirming the upgrade ended up having it (although it very obviously did, we don’t have anything explicitly saying it).
1 Like
Ha good point, i wasn’t aware of that
I have the reflex of using the map though tbh, since it’s the most useful to identify who is a threat and who has a higher chance of eating my missile when i throw it
tbh IF this patch is the make or break of naval, from Gaijin’s point of view, we are screwed.
A few OP and botched ships won’t solve the insane RP requirements the insane br compression (especially in coastal) the new arcade aiming system introduced unfairness…etc
You know what makes me stop playing naval? When I’m in an unstable, low fire rate dinky boat and ofc its rough seas, which makes ~50% of the shots go completely off target. Basic crap like this and the buggy mess of launching torps and sea mines(launches multiple when it shouldn’t, or refuses to launch any) is just there and never getting fixed.
Shame, cause I really wanted to have the Austro-Hungarian navy and river monitors, but I don’t think a dead gamemode will get more (sub)nations.
4 Likes
Ok, another patch, still SAS not fixed. So I can’t play yet. Do you plan to refund all this premium time not used because of you? I don’t think so
1 Like
Yes no one.
It was fine - and now it’s borderline unuseable.
2 Likes
1 Like
Oh, that’s the description of any patch in any game xdd
As old as the hills
Guys ? Can you tell me… Why, everytime you release new update you totally broke whole game…
Every plane, with my own configuration is broken and I have to build it again… GG GJ WP
I agree
As much as I do not care to be a bother, this GNSS change is abysmal. We have a thread around here somewhere indicating level of inaccuracy for a number of these systems, and a 10m radius for deviance is incredibly questionable, if derived from the guidance method. As someone far more inclined to hitting ground targets than others, this change pretty much removes the functionality of most GNSS weapons. Weapons that are notoriously accurate are suddenly missing by margins that do not match either the results demonstrated by use, or the results demonstrated by documentation.
Are there plans to either undo this poor decision, or to accurate model the deviation of each nation’s gps system? It is also incredibly strange that this issue also impacts weapons with IOG, when IOG should help limit any deviance that comes from the former guidance method.
An example of how useless you’ve made these weapons: Test drive with GBU 39 to strike mbts and ifvs, only 2 kills were scored. A similar failure rate is present on AASM (only IR version or actively lased laser guide version survives this change), and the gnss/laser/iog paveway 4 found on the typhoon. Presently, the only weapons to reliably destroy a target are the 1000kg+ class of soviet GNSS designated GBU.
At this point, you have created dead pylons across the majority of aircraft that rely on GNSS designated weapons to strike targets. It is, to be blunt, an incredibly shit decision. To resolve this screw up of exceptional proportions, are we expected to write bug reports for each and every weapon that has this flawed deviation to bring it up to parity with demonstrated efficacy?
At present, you are legitimately better of using dumb bombs. Which is incredibly bad given the environment that guided bombs are used to at to strike ground targets are not conducive to using dumb bombs, either in ground or in air.
11 Likes
Hello
If there are metrics to show the accuracy of what these weapons should be achieving, it would be best and safest to submit a report with the appropriate evidence, and we can pass it on for the developers consideration.
1 Like
Yeah each day we become more like COD…Going to be animated cat girls on these cards in no time
4 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
Unfortunately the snail is too biased
Please correct the camo for the CS/SA5. The camo should be on the missile launchers as well.
So the current lack of accucacy for GPS weapons can be reported?
What evidence is needed for such reports. Because at the moment ,every single GPS weapon having 10m of drift just feel… deliberate.
It is especially annoying as the main modes affected by this change are the air modes and A2G weapons are already massively nerfed within those gamemodes for the sake of GRB
You have accounts from Typhoon by Mike Sutton of GPS guided Paveways IVs able to hit the exact precise spot needed, twice in a row.
in-game this probably wouldnt be possible and it rather defeats the point of GPS to have such drift. Whats the point of GPS when its just as bad as IOG, actually come to think of it. IOG has 0 drift so is IOG now more accurate than GPS?
3 Likes
Firing off insults is unfortunately not going to progress any subject in any constructive manor. Please consider this a warning.
1 Like
Then respond in a constructive manner other than “Oh yeah, it’s actually on you lot instead of us for botching a fair simulacrum that accounts for us missing information and the plausible classified nature of any precise information regarding upcoming munitions”. As far as I see it, you lot are generally not keeping good faith with the playerbase regarding this change.
The change was unnecessary, and yet it has gone through. The change hinders nations with stricter confidentiality than others, yet it has gone through, in spite of history demonstrating the issue with this and your game. Assuming you are an honest person, surely you can see the issue here and reasonably could understand why we either want it reverted, or if we are going for accuracy, have it implemented across the game once accurate information is found.
9 Likes
Sorry but thats not how things operate. You do not get to simply ignore forum rules because you dont agree with an answer. Everyone else follows the same rules.
There is no justification for insults regardless of how you feel. Please keep discussions civil and respectful at a basic level. Otherwise we cannot help you at all.
4 Likes
Okay, great. Sure.
Now provide the information we’re asking after, lest you prove me correct. It seems incredibly ill boding that you will not provide a response to the actual query and instead are deflecting because I happen to be blunt in my approach to it.
4 Likes