Completely wrong as usual. Show me how which of these games offer a singular experience where you can play hundreds of tanks, planes, helis and ships while offering modes where you can bring in both ships and planes, and ground vehicles and planes. This is what companies look at when it comes to competition and there isn’t any on the same level. They may look at other games for ideas and inspiration to use within each separate mode but that doesn’t qualify them as direct competitors.
Read above. Considering how different they are from the way war thunder works there’s no real competition there and gaijin knows it
Wrong. War Thunder is unique. That doesn’t necessarily make it superior overall.
Clearly you didn’t bother to read this part.
No one rational would count boosters and SL since you can earn those from playing the game for free. The value of cosmetics is nothing compared to vehicles.
Wrong. This only features modern vehicles with no helis, ships or planes so not even close to war thunder. No one at gaijin would consider it competition in its current form
Wrong, it was touted as a war thunder killer back in the day when it was brought out, so it’s got nothing to do with Gaijin.
You’re just arguing to argue… Fact is I seen so many people jumping ship for that game proclaiming War Thunder was dying then, but alas… Just a massive skill issue with a side of whinge.
Being touted as a war thunder killer and actually being one are two different things…Who exactly was saying that anyway? The company that made it? I’m not arguing with you. I’m correcting you since you haven’t said a single thing that can be considered factual to me up to this point. People jumping ship and coming back isn’t a skill issue. It’s the stark realization of the fact that gaijin can be as scummy as they like since war thunder has no real competition. Which is a bad thing btw
Stop trying to make out EVERYONE is wrong for not giving you PRECISELY what you think you demand with regards to competition for this game.
You’re just arguing to argue, not accepting anything of what is given to you because you want to keep saying peopel are wrong and that there are no competitors.
This is why I genuinely hate the ‘’‘’‘discussions’‘’‘’ with people who merely say No, Wrong and all this round about nonsense.
There’s literally only two of you who are wrong so far. That doesn’t qualify as everyone if I remember my first grade math…I’m not DEMANDING anything. I’m pointing out facts that should seem obvious to anyone but the least rational. I’m not accepting anything that the TWO of you (yes two count a few more times if you need to) have said so far because nothing you said was correct.
I offered counterpoints to whatever was said and your only answer has been a childish, “No you”.
You must’ve failed in literacy, or you need better glasses, either way… Stop nitpicking and gatekeeping to suit your narrative, it’s ignorant of discussion.
(Edit - Why you flagging these posts… Can’t handle the return?)
The only thing you brought up was Armored Warfare which is laughable and I pointed out why. Maybe you should be the one going back to school for some basic literacy. What exactly am I “gatekeeping” here? Is some feature of the game being blocked for players because I’m a meanie bo beenie to you?
No, it’s a competitor and for this game to die people would need to leave for an alternative or stop playing, and with that competition, it’s not a question as to why these guys who are all commenting in here about how bad things are, aren’t leaving…
You’re on the forum, engaging in a ‘discussion’ proclaiming you want a list of competitor games, and you’re gatekeeping in terms of that response…
You playing the ‘meanie bo beanie’ quip just makes it clear your maturity level isn’t high enough to engage in actual discussion.
Act your age, not your shoe size.
(Edit - Why you flagging these posts… Can’t handle the jandle… Awww diddums…)
It’s not a competitor and I’m not going to explain why a third time. I’ve already explained that there is no competitor on a similar level and scale. How is asking for competitors (none of which listed are btw) gatekeeping? If anything you’re the one pushing for self censorship and gatekeeping to suit your one measly point which I demolished earlier.
My meanie bo beanie quip is an addressing your level of maturity since you don’t seem to be capable of formulating an argument beyond “I’m correct you’re wrong times infinity” without offering a single logical counterpoint. Even now you’ve still failed to explain precisely how Armored Warfare is a competitor to war thunder in the context of my reply to your claim
Maybe you should come back when your IQ level reaches the high double digits. You’re beneath me right now and I honestly feel pity for you
By setting unreasonable restrictions so nobody can give you a competitor because that criteria is unreasonably restrictive.
After all, this game started as just planes… Those games too need to start somewhere, and that’s what people thought when they bailed to go and play those making out they were the next big thing to only get stung.
I think you need to stop trying to insult a person just because you got factually owned in terms of actual discussion.
Wrong. The criteria are clear and set and facts. You not agreeing with them is your problem to solve.
Precisely. So they’re not competitors in their current form and never might be. So yet again an irrelevant point.
The only thing you’ve managed to own is the irrevocable fact that you’re incapable of making an argument that doesn’t sound like a five year old’s tantrum
I’ve already said, the tide of players who were moaning and complaining about how bad the game was that they were leaving to it, made it a competitor…
As I said, it’s just unreasonable gatekeeping to barricade you against anyone making any discussion.
Totally not irrelevant, at least not just because you said so… They are in terms of player draw and such things as being a competitor in any sense of making a comparible game.
Using big words doesn’t make your position any more stauch… What you’ve proven, as I was mentioning before, that you’;re just arguing to argue, for the sake of saying someone is wrong…
tank only would essentially kill SPAAs and Ground attackers all at once. ground attackers are useless in arb(big problem that needs addressing), and spaas need air targets to be usefull. there is no reason to go schorched earth and make tank only, we need proper cas balancing which would mean the cost increase(we have it), the buff off Spaa’s rewards and capabilities, and the reduction in cost for cap loadouts.