Yeah agree with you, that fish is 95% of the community and 99% in the Forum itself. They braindead people without have the widescreen of potential in this game
2 Likes
It’s broken as hell. Using super bad graphics should pyt you at slight disadvantage if anything, and not at a strong advantage
It… literally isnt, and it does put you at a disadvantage in some cases. Lower-end stuff already has a fairly heavy disadvantage compared to proper gaming PCs, and trust me, I know.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
ULQ is mainly used to get the competitive edge and ruins the experience for people who are not great at spotting, but want to at least have a level playing field in Ground RB. PCs that require ULQ are setups from 2011-2012 at most (PCs, not office laptops), you can buy something better for price of a bucket of KFC chicken.
Warthunder will only die in one case.
When there will be a game dev similar in values to Arrowhead and Larian studios. Make money, but not all the money, just enough to keep it running with treating playerbase right and fair.
Then Warthunder will vanish into oblivion and nobody will look twice.
Or literally anyone with a laptop w/o a GPU.
Which is a surprisingly large amount of people, and one of the reasons why WT is so appealing is, quite honestly, because it can run on a toaster. There are definitely issues with ULQ, but some of them are genuinely impossible to fix [Shadows being one of them lmao]
If there are any suggestions to improve it though, I would like to hear it.
During the Christmas holidays I had to play on a toaster that couldn’t run Word (Don’t ask, I don’t know either) and with ULQ I managed to get my dailies done etc… ULQ saved me there.
3 Likes
HA!
Honestly hilarious to be honest, even my uber-old laptop [The one I had before my last one] can run word - might see if it can run WT.
1 Like
Problem is when players use high-end stuff on ULQ settings…they get no disadvantage from low-end performance and all the advantages of ULQ…
I play on PS4/5 and they give me autoaim to compensate for the lack of mouse, with two important “features”: (1) All players can use it and (2) It still maintains the mouse advantage (albeit lower)
I understand ULQ is a need and i agree it should exist…but players using it SHOULD NOT have an advantage…
2 Likes
Me as well when my GPU fried so I had to play on internal one to time when I was able to buy new computer. On ULQ I was able get playable FPS (20 - 30 FPS).
Ditch ULQ altogether.
Seriously, if anyone is into gaming, he has access to something better than 10$ PC a homeless man sold for 3 packs of cigarettes during covid or laptop stolen from office during Hurricane Katrina.
Not everyone can afford what you think is just $10…
1 Like
my favorite flavor of crayon is green
That is not an option and will have a substantial impact, so no. I was asking on anything that you wold like changed, not wondering whether you wanted it removed entirely.
Eh, I think to a point some things are unavoidable [Shadows, for example], but I would be fine if we could narrow the gap. I do think there will always be a gap - it is inevitable, there will always be that “optimal” graphics setting.
Anything specifically you think could change about it, though?
I will do you one better - I predict that Warthunder may die in 1 to 200 years, IF there is not a total extinction event caused by a comet
1 Like
…or by the long expected & overdue pole shift / geomagnetic reversal :-)
1 Like
🤣😭🤣🤣🤣😭🤣👍👍
Put on some sunscreen and protect your phone, you’ll be alright
1 Like