War Thunder is Going to die in 2-4 Years

Meanwhile game is doing better every year …

I’ll never understand ppl that are frustrated by high tier, who forces you to play it?
Make your favorite 5.7 lineup, ace all crews, but all great premiums and just murder everybody
This game truly shines in Ww2 environment, tho I do enjoy modern jets as well
Modern tanks, I would play more if the time requirements to spade them would not suck my soul out

2 Likes

War Thunder is currently gaining players from eating Wargaming’s ‘World of Tanks.’
I believe that within the next 2-4 years, we will see another tank game emerge that will gradually draw players away from War Thunder. Gaijin has almost no brand loyalty from its players; only the sweat and effort they’ve invested in the game keep them playing.
The player intake graph for War Thunder would look like this: 30% new players to tanking and 70% coming from other war games. War Thunder has already reached everyone who wants to play it, and its mainstream perception is quite negative—not towards the players, but towards the game itself.

My point to play the game is becoming better at air combat, and you can do that even with reserve planes, so I don’t have the forever grind curse regular players have.
I do understand the suffering of players that are only interested in modern tech. They should either play a game that starts out with it and is the sole focus of the game, or try community made WT missions involving that tech.
I don’t mind BR disbalance (in air) because it gives me extra challenges to overcome.
I enjoyed the body pillows and am salty about Japan getting exclusive animey stuff
t. weaboo

And her my fellow players is the proof, THEY DON’T CARE, there are more players where you come from! If you leave so what they will have players behind you to replace you AND get there money! They don’t care if the game is good or not! They don’t care if you stay or not!

Damn, gaijin isnt going to bend to your will. They must really not care…

4 Likes

Don’t drink the kool aid!

Honestly, I don’t think WT will die anytime soon. Currently, there is no competition for WT, and there likely won’t be any in the near future. Moreover, I believe that after 10 years of playing (no other game in my history have I actively played for so long), the game feels now best to me, even though I’m starting to feel a certain repetitiveness in the same game modes, which is understandable after 10 years. Compared to the state 5 years ago, the game now offers much more, whether it’s the vehicles, new game mechanics, or new game modes (although this category still requires significant improvement).

2 Likes

I think game play wise is dead already unless you are new to the game and excited by it.
How long that will last is anybodies guess.

It’s pretty dead for anybody who came for WW2 and life in the first 6 BRs because WW2 does not exists anymore.Its spammed with much later artillery being used how artillery is not even used.Hardly makes for realism.

Mid BR is a Cold War mess of late WW2 and 50s 60s even 80s ,all with conflicting levels of tech and from what everybody is saying and what I am seeing top tier is an unplayable mess where Gaijins supposed biggest market the US can’t win a game with the best military tech on the planet supposedly being replicated.

So the game is good until you come to the point that you actually play a game then it goes wrong big time. The game plays out like a Tank museum open day and it’s the same game they have been pushing for 12 years.Grab the point ,over run the enemy Spawn as quick as you can and that’s it,repeated ad infinitum.

They keep telling us it’s combined arms but cant make CAS work in higher BRs ,tanks are fish in a barrel as they would be in real life.

That is a big problem when you go all out to replicate real life and find real life is instant death to tanks in a tank game. Doh!!!

Yeah it’s dead,the numbers are there(supposedly) but lots of people playing a boring game and spending until the penny drops as to just how bad it has all gotten.The forum is filled with goodbye letters from long standing veterans.

4 Likes

I read this twice…THIS^^ is the actual problem.

There is no way in hell, no balance, no numbers, no proof that will make the “player base” be happy :)

Someone will always think TANK A should be better and someone else will think the opposite.

I am guessing the vehicle you believe to be too strong will have people think it is not strong enough (or won’t be if they change it as you want)…or the other way around.
(it is also possible i agree with you…but someone will claim the “player base” does not)

BTW…IRL performance and balance often conflict with each other… :)

1 Like

The body pillows are a massive failure of devotion to a quality product from gaijin.

2 Likes

They NEED to bring back historical battles.

2 Likes

First played War Thunder in 2012, stopped and went off to play other games, then played again in 2014 when ground forces were added - stopped and went off to play other games. Got an email in 2018 going on about them adding T-64 to War Thunder, and I was like ‘ohhh yeah, I remember that game’. Have played religiously ever since that point in 2018, and the game has grown so much, changed so much - for the better. It’s not perfect, but to say it’s going anywhere any year soon - no. It’s like when all the whiners tried forming that union to boycott the game and leave negative Steam reviews. It all amounted to little. Players actually increased during the boycott which was fun. You’ll be playing this game in 5 years, just watch.

1 Like

The game still has a long way to go. Most people are already bored with World War II.
The game has serious problems, but it has no direct competition. BR compression problems, high level premiuns, horrible MM with continuous uptiers, copies of copies of vehicles and a long list that bores me to replicate.
It has been 13 years and sincerely it would be very difficult for something to face it.
The amount of possibilities that the game allows is overwhelming… I’ve been playing tanks and I’ve been testing planes for several months.
Starting with biplanes, then first jets and ending with modern jets seeing how the mechanics / weapons / performance change. In short it is literally several games in one.

It could be much better but they are in no hurry, they have more people than ever and the direct competition is getting further and further away. This is not good.

Looks at the year
2025.
Sir, that happened 8 years ago when people realized War Thunder had a better ground experience.
The playerbase today are largely people new to the genre. World of Tanks wished it was ever this popular.

Some people don’t like the genre so they leave, others like it so they stay. Simple as that.

Currently there are about a dozen games directly competing in the same genre, and obviously the thousands competing for general attention.

War Thunder just surpassed all the competitors in features, new-user friendliness, and content.

@aLiVe
Copy vehicles are still less than a tenth of the game.
Matchmaker doesn’t force uptiers on you, it’s your decision if you want to play popular BRs or not.
BR compression is a significantly smaller issue than it was in 2022 thankfully.

Also you can’t say: “Gaijin is faster than all other devs.” and “They are in no hurry” those are opposite statements.

I personally have been playing the game since December 2014, and I disagree with you on many points. It’s true that many WWII vehicles are mixed with post-war vehicles, but saying that this is far from realistic is absolute nonsense. Many WWII vehicle types continued to see combat long after WWII ended in various regional conflicts, where they encountered more modern vehicles. Moreover, from a balancing perspective, it’s impossible to completely separate WWII vehicles from post-war ones. But number of post-war vehicles in WWII can be potentionally decreased by introducing additional mechanics, such as RPG/MANPAD squads for IFVs, to raise their BR, for example. If you’re looking for a purely WWII battlefield, perhaps this game isn’t right for you, at the moment. Personally, I joined the game for the more modern vehicles (back then, it was the T-54), and now I mostly play Tier 5 and above. I play Arcade for tanks and Simulator for aviation.

Saying that the U.S. can’t win a single match in top-tier battles is also nonsense. I don’t know about RB (I dont play it), but in ASB, that’s definitely not true. The last time I checked, they were winning about 80% of matches.

As for veteran players, expecting them to play the same game forever is absurd. Some old players leave, some come back after a while, new players join, and some veterans stick around.

The issue I see with the game is its repetitiveness and the outdated design of battles on maps that are too small. This really needs improvement.

Overall I think its now much better like it was for example before 5 years.

It was pretty damn popular back in 2011, but nothing on this scale, indeed. By 2014, many in the WoT community were feeling fatigue at the direction the game was heading and WT sealed the deal with the introduction of ground forces. I played the heck out of WoT, had entire lines completed shortly after the game went retail - I spent a lot of $$$, I preordered all 3 of the preorder packages. All of that. But I haven’t touched that game since WT added ground forces, it’s as simple as that. Gaijin showed Wargaming how to make a free-to-play game that can stand the test of time.

Spoiler

Now if Gaijin can copy-paste Himmelsdorf, I’d be set for life

I don’t know where I said it’s faster? Don’t start inventing. They have more content but they are in no hurry to correct things due to lack of competition.

The 10% of copy paste seems to me very prudent on your part but I will not argue, in any case the target vehicles are less and less and if you get out of them you suffer more. The MM does not force you but INVITES you to play with less variety.
The issue of ease of use is very questionable.

What dozen games are similar? Armored Warfare and Wot.

Not by a long shot they took away the entire WOT base 8 years ago. Maybe 4 years ago at most. Wot is in a severe slump. But make no mistake this game has not reached the prime that WOT had.
The competitive system was simply sublime. The clan events and Clan Wars were a masterpiece. It engaged everyone, unlike this one where the clans are practically dead. In my clan we played with 3 simultaneous teams of 14 people to defend or attack territories. The theme of the roles of the tanks with their different visibility, armor, speed, penetration etc… It had a spectacular tactical component. You could play a slow approach to the game, wearing down with artillery or a rush with fast loader tanks.

@aLiVe
War Thunder has a lot of competition, and they have introduced DOZENS of new features that flat out didn’t exist 4 years ago necessary for a smoother game.

The matchmaker doesn’t invite you to play with less variety at all, that’s not what matchmakers do and you’d know this if you studied video games.

DCS, IL-2, World of Tanks, the failure that is GHPC [they refuse to add realistic turret movement], so on and so forth. Just cause you refuse to look doesn’t mean they don’t exist.

Speed has never been the meta BTW, speed increases BRs and the BRs keep them balanced, which makes speed not meta. The things with speed have major flaws in other aspects.

Just to add my own personal experience to the discussion: I have been playing this game for several years now, and I exclusively play low-to-mid tier air battles because this is what I enjoy most. I have researched 8 different nations up to at least rank III. War Thunder will allways be a ww2-themed game to me. Also, I understand, both from reading the forums, and by extrapolating from the issues seen at low level, that top level gameplay is bad due to bad design choices made by the developpers and this is why I am not in a hurry to reach top level in any tech tree. Ironically, the fact that the developpers are now so focused on modern vehicles and neglect older ones is a blessing in disguise because their bad decisions disproportionately affect top level players. When it comes to the gamemodes that I enjoy, the game (while it can be frustrating at times) is still fun most of the time, and while I agree that top level gameplay is probably bad, if I ever quit playing WT it will not be for this reason.

The MM does force you when certain vehicles suffer more than others in uptier. It is not necessary to explain to you that people do not want to suffer continuously.

If you want to put in the same league all those games go ahead… it’s like saying that Projetc cars and Iracing are direct competition.