War Thunder is Going to die in 2-4 Years

Game Discussion General Discussion
,
523

I’ve actually been trying to highlight to them this debate scenario for the past year as it makes the forum a cesspit of whinge and moan and any attempts to point players in other directions to avoid being as butthurt as they insinuate themselves to be, is met with a ‘You’re wrong’ response with a page and a half dictatorial about how and what goes with everything.

And then once it’s all over, the murmurings of those who were involved making out that someone is a manchild and always wrong in the aftermath.

It’s not a discussion with the terms that you provide, and I still am not wrong, as you’re just wanting to make out to avoid actively having a discussion, because you’re responses are all to shut it down and posture, as you’ve ended up doing.

524

Gaijin game also could be potentially destroyed in a year since yarnhub release ash rain or something like that

525

It was brass rain

526

I’d be more worried that that is a scam game in the likes of the kickstarter games that swept through in the past decade.

So many of those ‘RP’ games were passed off as being the next big thing, and ended up at nothing.

And even more so with those game trailers on facebook recently that were AI generated and were links to mere surveys and questionaires lol.

527

their game will most likely be closer to WOT then WT so i doubt that also not to mention people arent going to want to regrind another game its why enlisted isnt doing so well and why people want FPS in wt

528

It is a discussion with the only difference being that you’re not bringing anything to the table to back up your points.

My responses are counters. Me saying “wrong” isn’t an invitation to shut down discussion. That’s your sole interpretation. It’s an invitation for rational counters of which you haven’t provided any.

Your opinion whenever something doesn’t exclusively go your way. Even now I’m open to points countering mine yet you’re running to the mods and resorting to insults. What does that say about your maturity?

529

Nope.

530

I have to agree there is no hope of communicating with Gaijin. I tried to report a bug when I tried to order a French torpedo boat (VTB-14, BR 1.0, Rank 1) but it won’t let me because I must first purchase a Rank II coastal vessel before I can get this Rank 1 vessel. Since WHEN?!?!?! When did we have to wait to purchase inferior craft after we gained superior craft. Am I to be denied my Boeing P-26 Peashooter until I get my F-4E Phantom II. After I have the Phantom II, why do I want the P-26?

Anyway, customer support told me they can’t fix it because it isn’t a bug, it’s a feature. However, they recommended I make a suggestion in the forum for this modification. I attempted to add this post to the French naval suggestions and they wouldn’t allow it to be posted. There is obviously something wrong here and I don’t know if this is an internal fight and nobody wants to take the blame or what but when you can’t even get any form of appearance of remedy, it just seems screwed up.

VTB-14 rejected
VTB-14 rejected1600×900 79.8 KB

531

Pathetic

1 Like
532

Says you…

And you’re wrong… I’ll not further engage with you as I let you have the last word on our engagement yet you still bad-mounthed.

That’s pathetic.

1 Like
533

yall are gonna get timed out by the mods this is just an argument at this point

534

If anything hit up

And possibly escalate it.

Was it a premium store package, or a marketplace option?

536

if i remember correctly you need atleast 1 blue water ship to unlock coastal however i was playing naval for awhile idk if they changed this

537

Also it is the French tree, so it could be an odd one like the Israeli tree and such others with weirdly established trees.

image

That is messed up… And that is in the subtree of a reserve, you can unlock all the rest, just nothing below the first of the tree in that first boat.

538

Since they redid the bottom of the reserve coastal trees at the last major update, as was advertised at the time -

image

I reckon Gaijin could put it in neon and people would still be too ignorant to notice it…

539

This is not a premium store package or marketplace item. The French VTB-14 is part of the regular tech tree which makes it triply confusing that I need to get a higher Rank item to order a lower rank one once the research has been already completed.

1 Like
540

According to the quote you posted, the French VTB-8 (old reserve) is available upon purchase of first vessel of rank II. However, VTB-14 is NOT VTB-8. Yes, they have been grouped together but VTB-14 is NOT old reserve, therefore should NOT be included in the requirement to purchase a vessel of rank II. Besides which, I already HAVE VTB-8 and VTB-11 so, since I already have the old reserve AND the next one in the tree, why restrict the last one in the tree which isn’t a reserve craft?

Also, this is not a bug in armor or weaponry settings and it is not an aircraft lacking a cockpit or a ground vehicle lacking a visible crew (actually, since I can’t have it, maybe it does lack the crew, I really don’t know or care). None of the listed known bugs mention coastal vessels or placement within the tech trees. Further, if it WERE a KNOWN BUG, when I reported it to customer service, why would they tell me it ISN’T A BUG, IT’S A FEATURE and then tell me to suggest the placement on the forum after telling me it sounds like a good idea?

541

I haven’t done any of the tree so I was able to see what you mean.

I’d rush those coastals if you were going for it.

542

I’ve already got 13 French bluewater ships and at least 4 coastal vessels with 1 (VTB-8) spaded. If that were the issue, it wouldn’t apply in this case.

1 Like
543

Not really. If you want to use SPAAs, play Combined Arms. Tanks Only is for people who want to use tanks, simple as. Plus you still have the ZSU which can tear apart tanks, same as the 40mm Swedish thing, Gepard, VEAK, and OTOMATIC.