You must’ve failed in literacy, or you need better glasses, either way… Stop nitpicking and gatekeeping to suit your narrative, it’s ignorant of discussion.
(Edit - Why you flagging these posts… Can’t handle the return?)
1 Like
The only thing you brought up was Armored Warfare which is laughable and I pointed out why. Maybe you should be the one going back to school for some basic literacy. What exactly am I “gatekeeping” here? Is some feature of the game being blocked for players because I’m a meanie bo beenie to you?
No, it’s a competitor and for this game to die people would need to leave for an alternative or stop playing, and with that competition, it’s not a question as to why these guys who are all commenting in here about how bad things are, aren’t leaving…
You’re on the forum, engaging in a ‘discussion’ proclaiming you want a list of competitor games, and you’re gatekeeping in terms of that response…
You playing the ‘meanie bo beanie’ quip just makes it clear your maturity level isn’t high enough to engage in actual discussion.
Act your age, not your shoe size.
(Edit - Why you flagging these posts… Can’t handle the jandle… Awww diddums…)
1 Like
It’s not a competitor and I’m not going to explain why a third time. I’ve already explained that there is no competitor on a similar level and scale. How is asking for competitors (none of which listed are btw) gatekeeping? If anything you’re the one pushing for self censorship and gatekeeping to suit your one measly point which I demolished earlier.
My meanie bo beanie quip is an addressing your level of maturity since you don’t seem to be capable of formulating an argument beyond “I’m correct you’re wrong times infinity” without offering a single logical counterpoint. Even now you’ve still failed to explain precisely how Armored Warfare is a competitor to war thunder in the context of my reply to your claim
Maybe you should come back when your IQ level reaches the high double digits. You’re beneath me right now and I honestly feel pity for you
It IS a competitor.
By setting unreasonable restrictions so nobody can give you a competitor because that criteria is unreasonably restrictive.
After all, this game started as just planes… Those games too need to start somewhere, and that’s what people thought when they bailed to go and play those making out they were the next big thing to only get stung.
I think you need to stop trying to insult a person just because you got factually owned in terms of actual discussion.
How? Explain if you’re even capable of it.
Wrong. The criteria are clear and set and facts. You not agreeing with them is your problem to solve.
Precisely. So they’re not competitors in their current form and never might be. So yet again an irrelevant point.
The only thing you’ve managed to own is the irrevocable fact that you’re incapable of making an argument that doesn’t sound like a five year old’s tantrum
I’ve already said, the tide of players who were moaning and complaining about how bad the game was that they were leaving to it, made it a competitor…
As I said, it’s just unreasonable gatekeeping to barricade you against anyone making any discussion.
Totally not irrelevant, at least not just because you said so… They are in terms of player draw and such things as being a competitor in any sense of making a comparible game.
Using big words doesn’t make your position any more stauch… What you’ve proven, as I was mentioning before, that you’;re just arguing to argue, for the sake of saying someone is wrong…
This isn’t discussion… @Pacifica @Stona_WT The thread needs closure.
I’m done with you @capnlunch you can have that vital last word.
0⁹U3
there are no competitors OBJECTIVELY.
Ace combat and war thunder are not competitors not even close. that is the kind of absurd take id expect from you
They are competitors.
tank only would essentially kill SPAAs and Ground attackers all at once. ground attackers are useless in arb(big problem that needs addressing), and spaas need air targets to be usefull. there is no reason to go schorched earth and make tank only, we need proper cas balancing which would mean the cost increase(we have it), the buff off Spaa’s rewards and capabilities, and the reduction in cost for cap loadouts.
they are not that is absurdly stupid
It absolutely isn’t…
ok so is gta in competition with war thunder? they both have fighter jets!
The fact that they came back proves it wasn’t…It’s kind of obvious…Not even a second of thinking was needed here.
This is just you butthurt that you don’t have any rational arguments to back up your points.
Considering that you said that these players came back, how exactly this relevant now?
Basic high school English kiddo.
Which proves that you’ve closed your mind to rationality and simply looking for validation.
Yeah this is your ultimate goal any time a thread criticizing gaijin pops up and you lack the ability to defend your points with logical arguments. Don’t think we aren’t wise to it. Your feewings being hurt aren’t a valid enough reason to close a thread
1 Like
Well, no because they’re so different…
But I could make a mod or a script that would make them be more aligned…
ace combat and war thunder have as much in common as gta and war thunder. again youre absurd, ace combat isnt even a multiplayer focused.
1 Like
Ace combat being dogfighting is a heck load more aligned than your want to absurdly throw out GTA…
Sure looks to be multiplayer able, so what are you on about?
Exactly. The last multiplayer focused ace combat was infinity and that turned out to be a failure.
That’s adorable. Now show me what it has that arcade mode doesn’t offer beyond a different art style
What was that? I can’t read you, over.