The basket isn’t the turret drive, are you blind? Look at the pics. The drive is a rather small module at the turret ring with a power cable leading to it from below. Thats it. The drive was already there from the beginning. It was alreaedy ‘modeled’.
Thats a year-old screenshot. The drive had been there all the time and had a damage model if hit. Why should this huge turret basket included in its damage model?
People have asked for modeling fixes that predate turret basket implementation. As well as basket armor implementation to combat getting killed through the turret ring
what we want vs what “gaijin want and think it is” instead
A damaged Abrams basket will cause a crew to fix the issue before continuing to rotate the turret.
And the floor being damaged could cause issues.
That’s pretty much what that’s simulating.
Have russian tanks no floor? Is the crew hoovering?
They do, and that’s an argument to make. Obviously Gaijin’s priority was the autoloaders themselves.
They’ll find a way
Yeah… They will.
Would this just equate to having more modules in the turret or the hull anyways? Like sure there’s no basket but all the modules Gaijin is claiming to be involved will just be bolted to the wall of the chassis or in the turret? So when hit, the entire turret/hull will be red/black(?)
Because before every gun sounded the same or very similar. Now each tank is different. I think they are beautiful. Now all we need is the proper/realistic crew commands for each nation.
It was the FIRST thing I checked. The sigh of relief when I saw we didn’t have it, I was about to crash out otherwise. Can’t give us correct ammo count or storage, reload, armour so wouldn’t be surprised if they did add it.
Yeah we all know that’s a lie lol what have they buffed thats NATO? I can tell you what they nerf. What about all the tickets submitted on russian vehicles that are incorrect and get ignored by the bias devs? Did you know the Su30m and Su34 dont carry KH38MTs in real life? Yet here we are lol
Shouldn’t there also be an armored compartment modeled internally around the turret and in between the driver compartment and the turret?
Sure the turret drive may be electric but ultimately you need hydraulics for mechanical advantage. How else can the crew turn a turret that weighs in the tons with engine off.
Using batteries or an APU lmao.
the bottom part of the turret or the floor work like the plate in the microwave, its there for smoother turn and support the weight of the turret
Su-30 and Su-34 are both pictured with Kh-38s.
Mig-29 still has too much fuel consumption on dry thrust.
Rafale and Typhoon were “buffed” in speed.
Panther 2 can depress its gun at more angles now.
Multiple British tanks can zoom in more.
TWS patterns were fixed.
So on and so forth.
now compare it to the amount of inaccuracies and bug reports
the buff is minimal compare to the amount of so call “buff”
Not with 38MT.
Can’t, I don’t speak 3 languages that bug reports are made in: Russian, Mandarin, and English.
I only speak English out of those three.
There are hundreds of inactioned Soviet bug reports in English alone.
@kitsune_qq
That requires proving that the 38MT requires different wiring which is a hard proof when the Kh-38s were made in the modern era and could very well be serial wiring connections which is more universal and software focused.
Even AGM-65s are universal on all aircraft that can use any of them, it just needs to be tested and recorded that they can be used for War Thunder purposes, but that’s the reality.