what we want vs what “gaijin want and think it is” instead
2 Likes
A damaged Abrams basket will cause a crew to fix the issue before continuing to rotate the turret.
And the floor being damaged could cause issues.
That’s pretty much what that’s simulating.
Have russian tanks no floor? Is the crew hoovering?
2 Likes
They do, and that’s an argument to make. Obviously Gaijin’s priority was the autoloaders themselves.
They’ll find a way
Yeah… They will.
Would this just equate to having more modules in the turret or the hull anyways? Like sure there’s no basket but all the modules Gaijin is claiming to be involved will just be bolted to the wall of the chassis or in the turret? So when hit, the entire turret/hull will be red/black(?)
Because before every gun sounded the same or very similar. Now each tank is different. I think they are beautiful. Now all we need is the proper/realistic crew commands for each nation.
It was the FIRST thing I checked. The sigh of relief when I saw we didn’t have it, I was about to crash out otherwise. Can’t give us correct ammo count or storage, reload, armour so wouldn’t be surprised if they did add it.
Yeah we all know that’s a lie lol what have they buffed thats NATO? I can tell you what they nerf. What about all the tickets submitted on russian vehicles that are incorrect and get ignored by the bias devs? Did you know the Su30m and Su34 dont carry KH38MTs in real life? Yet here we are lol
2 Likes
Shouldn’t there also be an armored compartment modeled internally around the turret and in between the driver compartment and the turret?
Sure the turret drive may be electric but ultimately you need hydraulics for mechanical advantage. How else can the crew turn a turret that weighs in the tons with engine off.
Using batteries or an APU lmao.
3 Likes
the bottom part of the turret or the floor work like the plate in the microwave, its there for smoother turn and support the weight of the turret
Su-30 and Su-34 are both pictured with Kh-38s.
Mig-29 still has too much fuel consumption on dry thrust.
Rafale and Typhoon were “buffed” in speed.
Panther 2 can depress its gun at more angles now.
Multiple British tanks can zoom in more.
TWS patterns were fixed.
So on and so forth.
1 Like
now compare it to the amount of inaccuracies and bug reports
the buff is minimal compare to the amount of so call “buff”
Not with 38MT.
1 Like
Can’t, I don’t speak 3 languages that bug reports are made in: Russian, Mandarin, and English.
I only speak English out of those three.
There are hundreds of inactioned Soviet bug reports in English alone.
@kitsune_qq
That requires proving that the 38MT requires different wiring which is a hard proof when the Kh-38s were made in the modern era and could very well be serial wiring connections which is more universal and software focused.
Even AGM-65s are universal on all aircraft that can use any of them, it just needs to be tested and recorded that they can be used for War Thunder purposes, but that’s the reality.
1 Like
Can’t forget that
Was implemented even though the ECCM/Sealed subvariant of the AIM-54C was right there as a drop in replacement that bypasses the issue.
But no, It’s got to be totally accurate, in some respects and balancing concessions in others.
[DEV]The F-14B should be impacted by this change to IRST/EOTS
Presently the F-14B doesn’t use its EO tracker as part of its STT automation. As such isn’t subject to the fix requested.
The fix for the aircraft mentioned in this report is only to resolve the automation rapidly changing between radar and IR/EO while in STT. It isn’t to grant full launch capabilities in those modes and doesn’t allow for it when manually switching to IR/EO modes.
Because it wasn’t modeled properly in the first place, so effectively Catch 22’s an earlier report on the issue that is nearly two years old at this point.
Gaijin practically has to be actively searching the reports submitted as a suggestion, in order to perform Soft balancing of vehicles where they can.
It’s certainly not any form of “First In First out” queue, and Triage doesn’t otherwise seem to follow any observable patterns.
2 Likes
Though, it has been proven the AGM-65s are inter-compatible like that. I would say burden of proof should be on whether it can, not whether it can’t.
1 Like