1.VT5 should get a lining.
2.VT5 in the upper front half was supposed to block the fire of small-caliber rapid-fire guns. The side armor should also not be able to penetrate the 12.7 machine gun. It’s a 33-ton tank!
3.VT5 doesn’t have that stupid turret basket! If gaijin insists on adding, he should get the same hit model as Leopard 2. If you think there is, please give enough convincing proof!
114 Likes
agree, the video and the report from cctv of vt5 show that vt5 does not have any turret basket
47 Likes
gaijin, please use your brain to think about the VT5 as a tank with automatic loading in the tail compartment, you somehow join this huge, false structure, how do the tank crew move the ammunition? Why is there such an inexplicable battery in the tail section of the tank? You mean that a 33-ton tank is not even as good as an armored vehicle in terms of side protection, and the tank cannot fire if it is hit by a machine gun in the rear of the hull???
57 Likes
The VT5 is a 33-ton “lightweight main battle tank”, not an 18-ton airborne assault gun like the Octopus-SD! A tank about the same weight as the T-54 that can be pierced by heavy machine guns on the front and sides? Gaijin, do you think that’s funny?
43 Likes
this is ZTZ-15, but they should share similar design, and a unknow source image suggests it has no bucket.
41 Likes
bro think all Light tanks are all Octopus SD
12 Likes
in the glorious Gaijing universe, every tank with an autoloader bustle obviously comes with a turret basket! Because why bother with pesky things like historical blueprints when the brilliant Snail Masters can just wave their antennae from thousands of miles away and magically intuit the entire internal layout? Certainly no wild guesses involved here. Nope, none at all. 🙃
10 Likes
This is Chinese modular additional armor for use in various light armored vehicles. Gaijin thinks that the armor behind the finger is only about 5ke.
34 Likes
can you imagine a tank with 38 tons only has steel plate thinner than armed car???
16 Likes
Where are the composite armor, GAIJIN？
9 Likes
No Composite armor and wierd turrent basket 😅seem like Gaijin make this vehicle worst than the 2S25M
6 Likes
Finally, cn got a 33 tons light tank which protection is equal to ru’s 18 tons 2s25, wat a shameless prejudice!
6 Likes
As a tank with a bustle autoloader, why design the entire loading basket as a single integrated unit instead of adopting a segmented approach like the Leopard 2? This reeks of complete carelessness and arrogance.Or developer think Protection that is inconsistent with reality needs to be strengthened by disgusting structures.
8 Likes
It is clear that the VT5 should not be in its current state. The creators have essentially “fantasized” a version that conforms to their own stereotypical impressions of Chinese tanks and then produced it. Moreover, it is evident that every update related to Chinese content is done in an extremely perfunctory, if not outright arrogant, manner. It’s akin to dealing with parents you dislike but still have to rely on.
7 Likes
You claim to be the most authentic war game, right? There is sufficient evidence to prove that the VT5 does not have a turret basket. Why did you include something that never existed inside the model? Was it a planning error?
9 Likes
Holy moly thats bad. thats like Falcon turret basket bad. and the falcon only has that as an artificial nerf. Gaijin tends to be nice to the china tree as BVVD is a china main, wtf are they thinking.
edit: Of COURSE stona locks this thread. No player complaint allowed
7 Likes
Well play gaijin, this is next level unprofessional.
6 Likes
The armor of VT5 should not be so fragile. It is a 33 ton lightweight main battle tank
6 Likes
Even with overwhelming evidence, some people still stubbornly cling to their biases and arrogance, refusing to admit their mistakes."
5 Likes
Except the Japanese tanks lol
3 Likes