VT5 should fix protection and get rid of that damn turret gondola

[DorothyFranks]

Gaijin, use your brain when inputting the VT5’s data, instead of assuming that 21st-century tanks use armor as heavy as steel but with penetration resistance worse than aluminum. If you think photos don’t prove the VT5 lacks a turret basket, then every tank should logically have one by default.

[怎么又飞头了-呜呜呜]

The 33-ton tank has an 18-ton level of protection. Does Gaijin think that the people inside weigh five tons each?

[LiquidGod750-live]

Everyone in this thread now knows how it feels to be a Israeli main with the Merkavas

[Busheedoh]

@来如雷霆收震怒_罢如江海凝清光

1.VT5 should get a lining.
2.VT5 in the upper front half was supposed to block the fire of small-caliber rapid-fire guns. The side armor should also not be able to penetrate the 12.7 machine gun. It’s a 33-ton tank!
3.VT5 doesn’t have that stupid turret basket! If gaijin insists on adding, he should get the same hit model as Leopard 2. If you think there is, please give enough convincing proof!

What is your evidence? Go form a bug report if you think something is wrong. Gaijin has answered multiple bug reports alreadyd, a failure to follow proper sourcing etiquette has been noticed in all of these reports:

1. VT-5 Turret Basket Modeling Inaccuracies
2. [DEV]VT-5’s protection capability is wrong
3. [DEV]Error in the armor of VT5 tank
4. [DEV]VT-5’s protection capability is wrong

Provide proper sourcing as moderators insist and the issue will be fixed.

Bug Report Source Standards

[来如雷霆收震怒_罢如江海凝清光]

There are others who have submitted enough information, and I have submitted relevant reports. It would be even better if you could not give examples of these reports that are obviously misformatted.

[Busheedoh]

Forward these reports to forum technical moderators. You can find them in the “Game Masters” section of the site.

[来如雷霆收震怒_罢如江海凝清光]

Is it okay to do any of them？

[Busheedoh]

I recommend sending a message to the ones who are most active:

[来如雷霆收震怒_罢如江海凝清光]

ok，tks