Type 90B has virtually no armor, DM33 which at this BR is redundant (481mm of pen) and generation 1 thermals
I believe it was based on open and legal sources, not the ones that were cough leaked cough classified cough materials.
1 Like
But also 4 seconds of reload and better mobility, the VT4 is lolpennable as much as the Type 90B
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I’m pretty sure it was just an arbitrary number they made up on the spot
As someone who played ztz-96(p) 10.3, and type 90 11.7, the former stands ever so slightly more chances than the latter from 3BM42 (9.7 comon Soviet round) APFSDS.
As someone who has both, the mobility on the type 90 isn’t better than the vt4, it’s almost identical.
1 Like
It’s not china that made a meh tank, its gaijin deliberatly nerfing PLA vehicles all recently, look the last ones who got added…HQ17…VT4…VT5…
I just want a more appropriate BR…nothing crazy or BR breaking…
1 Like
Japan’s vehicles too we want the same but we cannot have everything we want
Its literally following a trend of other 11.7 light tanks why not compare those with their lineups
Atleast you have your 4 seconds lol we are battling since years to not have the worst reload in game…
I was present when battling for the Leclerc to have 5 seconds, it took the effort of dozens to let it happen…
1 Like
isnt it for japan like 3.2s? /shrug
Reload is a balancing factor
1 Like
the autoloader trade for not even stopping rounds at the turret and upperfrontplate is quite big…
Same to us, colossal LFP with accepted but missing spall-liners with a literal C4 under called carousel…
I am aware, but at its current placement J/DM33 (11.7) isnt that a bit too much?
everyone has 500mm+ pen while your here trying to cheese it with 481mm
Eh, never cared for the type 90’s when the tkx (p) existed personally
bc its a better tank…
Looks better which is my main reason lol, non squished 2A4
TKX-P is nice i just dont like the placement