Let’s use nice numbers for this bc I’m too lazy to look at the actual count
Let’s say there are 500 people who use this forum, 300 of them are British mains. You just said that nobody plays Britain, despite them being a clear majority.
By be careful I mean once there’s one of them there’s usually 3-4 more who gang up on you.
There’s like 12 of the nagging ones and the rest only come out of the woodwork every so often, like the CR2 thread and the brimstone people
I need to screenshot this, print it and frame it
went from reply 110 to here. Anything i miss?
bro got caught in 4K
It was bro’s first and last Time posting in the forums
seems like it
And for this reason the American branch is the weakest SPAA, the weakest CAS and the weakest tanks, which are constantly nerfed?
That is, if some nation has problems with skills, then this nation needs to be nerfed so much that the win rate is close to 10?
Great job done.
I’m glad at least someone raised this issue.
The top nation USA is 90% defeats. The whole problem is in Abrams and SPAA.
I would also suggest Clickbait to lower the BR to 11.3. This tank is not much better than M1A1 IPM and I think it will not affect the balance much.
The US does not have the weakest tanks, SPAA, or CAS.
Yes you are right, Britain has something even worse than ADATS. But Britain is RIP, no one plays it.
People lie on the internet? NO WAY!
the british ADATS is better than the US one because it has much better elevation angles
Please never post on the forums ever again. You consistently have the worst balancing ideas to the point where it’s not even funny anymore.
Him and that pangolin might secretly be twin brothers
Don’t forget sartt as the “special” one.
Why not? Clickbait has a terribly low win rate.
Clickbait is basically the HC in the TT right? What’s the win rate for that one? (Mainly sense nubs cant get there hands on it that easily)
