It’s only in WT that it sucks.
WT has little or no relationship with RL.
ETA: and any connection it does have is accidental.
It’s only in WT that it sucks.
WT has little or no relationship with RL.
ETA: and any connection it does have is accidental.
Well the M3A4(XM913, 50mm) / AMPV ( AMPV ExMEP) demonstrator, or Stryker Dragoon (M813, 30mm) does exist; and that’s effectively at least 40% of the way to a notional XM30 for War Thunder’s purposes anyway so there are definitely candidate options options that remain for a modern Light tank / IFV for the US tree.
Yes, but i speak about the XM 30 project that is supposed to replace the bradley.
The rheinmetall one being a digital video he posted. Dunno whobthe other competitor is right now
south Korea
No.
Also, USA, USSR, Germany, China, and Israel. That’s more than two.
No. South Korea should be part of an independent United Korea.
And out of those ussr and us need it the least.
China could do for one for the lower ranks
And germany for cold war era.
But ussr and Us need one the least definitly
M60 marksman could easily be an option ontop of what was teased in the 2025 logo.
Neither China nor Germany need a subnation. Germany especially has multiple times as many options as some nations like Italy and Japan, and China, while not great for lower tiers, have enough unique options to at least have it be better than it is now.
u have sppa but you don’t play it
Germany has just as many options and potential overall as the UK and france. They are very comparable.
While modern only China, US, Russia can better compared project and potential wise.
If germany in your words doesnt need a subtree neither did the UK or France.
Considering both UK and france got multiple sib nations even means that germany deserves it just as much
China can definitely use a sub nation, North Korea is right there
Isrial was technically a US subtree before it became a nation, also Germany technically has subtrees under the guise of east and west germany
Not realy, its one country. For all sense and purposes. Its not discussable like eith china
That is why I said technically it veichals from different groups, NATO and the Warsaw Pact, also what china?
China has Taiwan. Germany inherently gets like 3 different trees because of the East/West divide, and is likely to get a swiss tree. I forgot about USSR. So 3 nations.
There is no reason to have a “independent korean tree.” South Korea should go to the US. North korea should go to china- which is a pretty reflective of the division of the peninsula.
I agree that US top tier spaa is terrible but wanting a paper tank is not the way to go.
Also, stop with these low effort posts. The only thing you’re doing is invalidating those who have conern for top tier US. (Unless thats the goal. I won’t be suprised. Never wouldve thought this site had “politics”)
its 1 nation, there is no subtree right now until it has been confirmed
what doesn’t have politics anymore, heck people are even making lego’s political like not even the company the actual product