USA needs AGM-154C with IR not the GNSS version!

unguided rockets are already F&F

2 Likes

I meant ones with IR tracking.

https://www.navy.mil/Resources/Fact-Files/Display-FactFiles/Article/2166748/agm-154-joint-standoff-weapon-jsow/

13 Likes

tbh it will likely get the ir seeker because we also got the penguin missile used for ground attacks.

even if the seeker is not good irl, t can be added since gaijin added the aasm 250 who irl have a 2km lock range limit

its literally what i sent and what you sent clearly tells you that it can only target moving seaborne targets

My guy the IR AASM can’t lock tanks IRL and it can it game i think this will in game

2 Likes

the C base has a bunker buster warhead so idk how good it would be… and i didnt even know there was a anti ship version.

Your claim was it could only hit naval targets btw.

And i don’t see how it wouldnt be able to hit moving targets as it’s literally got an ir seeker.

3 Likes

can you not purposefully lie literally 5 posts down from what i wrote? C’s IR seeker is for anti ship

The IR seeker is terminal, its guided by GPS from the beginning to just about to contact the target. Navy uses it mainly for fixed points on the map like factories and such. The AGM-154B is the one you guys are asking for as it has the infrared sensors for tanks. And the AGM-154C-1 is the one that can target ships btw

image
Well, the HAMMER only has the IR seeker for facilities…
image

4 Likes

And this matters in game how?

lock range…

matters a lot.

isnt the penguin also a anti ship missile that can lock (not very well since its TV but still) tanks?

No?

that that it can’t lock tanks so its exactly the same as GPS version?

If the missile can’t lock tanks IRL then they can’t lock tanks in game either, look at the penguin IR missile for example.

And? It will lock tanks in game because it is IR doesn’t even matter how it works

oh i thought the penguin could in game. nevermind.

I see the IR AASM that can in game from quite a distance