Gaijin for refusing to add actually competitive russian aircraft and the US mains who cry every patch they dont get a new top end fighter/multirole that dominates everything which has lead to gaijin caving to them and there’s very obvious examples you can point to, one such being the F-15C on release with its AMRAAM count which was going to be limited to 6 or less AMRAAMS for balance reasons because if it got 8 it would completely shit on everything as no 4th gen for another year would be able to compete with it and guess what US mains cried that it should have 8 and it subsequently has been the most dominate aircraft ever since but in contrast you can look to the Mig-29 which is supposed to have R-73 and for balance reasons at the time only got R-60Ms yet now its currently underperforming massively over its 4th gen competition and still hasnt recieved R-73.
At this point you have to be blind to not see that certain nations will get preferential treatment. Now it wouldn’t be so bad if it was every other update that one nation would have a clear advantage so people would be given an actual reason to grind out another techtree but as it stands right now why even bother playing anything other than US air since all other Air trees are dead.
Thankfully for this update france, britain and germany finally get something worth playing but you can already see on a lot of forum posts the US mains crying about not being top dog so i imagine we’ll see the spring patch have a new US toptier that dominates everything in Air again for the next year most likely a Super hornet with 10 AMRAAMs or maybe one of the Advanced Eagles since it seems that gaijin is prepping for better IR missiles to be introduced.
How does turnfighting relate to this you’re not making any sense this doesn’t answer what i said
Isnt that what gaijin had done to the Mig-29 when it was first added with the F-16A because the F-16A is inferior along with what they had done to the Su-27 and also what they have been doing to other nations
So you’re purposefully ignoring this because it disproves the inferiority question
The rest of your replies are just you coping because you have no real answer to what im saying, deep down you know im right but you just refuse to admit it
People on the forum like sartt are why i almost never put any genuine effort into discourse here there’s zero point when all they care about is that the single techtree that they play curbstomps everyone else, this is an issue most prevalent with US mains and its painfully obvious with the amount of threads you see crying about how
“X US vehicle needs X”
“X US vehicle should be a lower br because i can’t get a nuke every game in it”
“X insert non US vehicle here killed me its Undertiered”
Then you check their stats and its a guy with 10k games and 99% are US vehicles and he has 836 deaths in an M1A1 Clickbait with 147 kills
Why would i even bother giving you an actual in depth reply youve already shown the majority of people here that you literally dont care, you act like a child so im going to treat you like one.
wait until you learn that production date means nothing.
Also, you say that there isn’t anything competitive to be added, and then ask for a blatantly OP plane to be added to counter something that isn’t comparable?
Aircraft age isnt a factor if that were the case then since the F-16C is an aircraft from 1991 shouldn’t it be facing the Mig-29M/35 as thats an aircraft from 1991 granted the mig would destroy the F-16C but hey since you get a 90s plane then so should russia accordingly.
Please show where ive complained about its turnrate
You mean like how gaijin forced the Su-27 to have more drag and has its AOA limited still
The big issue with these types of people is they always go “heh should’ve built a better plane” which if you look at the actual dates for alot of current russian inventory they were mostly all 90s prototypes that got dropped because of the minor issue of economic collapse and losing large chunks of industry and didnt get picked back up till the early 2010s
I imagine if the US suddenly collapsed in the 90s instead they probably wouldn’t be churning out hundreds of F-35 and would still be reliant on older 80s and early 90s aircraft even up to now they’d probably be doing better than how russia did post collapse but not to a significant degree
The next time somebody complains about the r73 and how they need aim9x to counter it I’m just going to tell them they shouldv’ve made a thrust vectoring 9M earlier
just going to be more russians saying " our planes can’t compete! something something " US Mains " SOMETHING SOMETHING irrelevant because aim 120s are a better missile. Already caught 2 of them in false statement and lies
