Nope, close range ended up meta after people learned how to notch or MP. So buffed Su-27SM could compete
right, and?
thats the Rafale. it outperforms the EFT AESA just as much as it outperforms the F-15C GE.
Lets just move it to 14.7.
Because they are not comparable. Do you automatically go for the dumbest strawman ever?
You think like a toddler who wants revenge just because the F-15C was meta dosnt mean the current meta is fine
Do you automatically go for “US slightly worse = unplayable” “US notably better = baalnced”
No. You clearly want the typhoon to be busted to fulfill some dumb revenge prophecy/national compensation fixation on the US
Also arnt you the same guy who came on here and bitched saying US players want their stuff to be better in every way?? to then turn around and do the same thing
Okay, seriously, US mains are really really bad at this game its unreal.
So this is the last I will say on this, because its like talking to a brick wall.
F-15C GE performs better than 2/3 of what is at 14.3. This is a fact.
Just because you cant win 1v3 dogfights, doesnt mean its DOA.
Just because the US isnt meta, doesnt mean the US needs massive buffs to be competitive.
Imo, F-15C GE could quite happily be 14.7, and imo, F-15E and F-15C MSIP II are both under BRed too. The F-15C definetly outperforms pretty much everything at 13.7 at the moment.
So
Just because its “Made in the USA” doesnt mean its the best.
Just because the US Isnt Meta, doesnt mean they are doing poorly
Just because US players are bad at the game. Doesnt mean they need significantly better tools.
M1A2T proves this last point, because it was literally the best performing MBT of Dec 2026 despite most players probably be stock for a good chunk of that time.
So no, the US doesnt need ground tree buffs and quite frankly, they dont really need air tree buffs either. They just need to get better at the game
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Tiger Tank level take
1 Like
I always forget about this because I cbf grinding its modifications in Heli EC. I have it in the lineup and never use it, lmao. I should really unlock the F+F and join in on the bias.
How blind are you? okay yes a lot of players are bad or just casual gameers but you can’t deny that the vehicles underperform bafly from armor to gun to missiles… compare it to russia bmpt missiles lofting etc… heck even hellfires suck so please use the grey matter you have and make it work.
2 Likes
Its not better at dogfighting than any EF, Rafale, Gripen E or even the J-10C. And I could even make a case for a skilled Su-30 user.
Its not better at BVR kinematically than any Eurocanard, the F-15 series in general has an objectively terrible instantaneous turn compared to any other 14.3, and its energy bleed around mach 1 is catastrophic for a vehicle that has a terrible acceleration when, again, is compared to any eurocanard.
It’s RWR is standard as most 14.3s.
Sorry bud, but you’re making a whole stretch of a case on this one. It’s mid as hell, a glorified MSIP II which only got an interesting feature to go for (12 ARH loadout) just a couple weeks ago, while being mostly a niche plane for sweats before it.
2 Likes
Energy, in pretty much any form, follows the path of the least resistance. That is like high school level physics knowledge.
This is also the concept on which the blowout panels work. The blowout doors don’t need to handle an extreme amount of explosive pressure since the panels on top are the path of the least resistance.
And your opinion about top tier overall and top tier jets from non british nations is questionable because you are a british main with not outstanding skill.
1 Like
Your air RB stats are not indicative of an outstanding player you make yourself out to be. With all due respect, I doubt one such as yourself can share a worthwhile opinion regarding an aircraft you don’t own.
2 Likes
Or maybe give them missiles like the Kh-38MT instead of the antediluvian Mavericks? Maybe give them tank armor like the Soviet T-90M? Or give them missiles like the LMUR? So that one missile is a one-shot? Or give them air defense like the Pantsir S1? The US is clearly the weakest nation in the game not because of skill, but because 99% of the time they’re playing against the most overbuffed nation in the game.
The US doesn’t have anywhere near the capabilities of the USSR’s tree in the game.
The US has the oldest tanks, the oldest planes, the oldest shells. And all of these have the worst performance in the game. The US doesn’t have anywhere near the capabilities of the USSR’s tree.
1 Like
because most of the people who were playing the M1A2T in december were the better players that finished the grind the quickest.
Sure, if they also nerf the Abrams with all the downsides that the T-90M has.
You really need to stop trying to make the T-90M sound like some great tank, it’s mid at best if I’m being generous. All the M1A2s are easily better.
1 Like
Explain to me how a tank surrounded by Relikt armor, multilayered armor, and mobility can be worse than the Abrams, which has no armor at all and explodes on any hit. Because the Abrams doesn’t have a spall liner.
Because armor is the only advantage that it has, while the Abrams beats it in every other way, yes including mobility.
Players like you with garbage aim just struggle against armor.
Also, just because you voluntarily choose to handicap your SEPv2 doesn’t mean that the T-90M has equal mobility. As long as you voluntarily keep TUSK 2 equiped you have 0 right to complain about mobility.
EDIT: if you get penetrated in the M1A2s you have already made a bunch of mistakes, which tbf wouldn’t be suprising in your case.
1 Like
When they tell me that one side should aim for weak spots and the other side should just shoot at the tank’s silhouette, I call it imbalance.
You do know that removing task armor doesn’t affect speed or mobility, right? You’re simply voluntarily depriving yourself of protection from ATGMs and autocannons.