They could, but they also havent buffed the CR3TD despite the 12.0 BR and weaker than several at the same BR. I cant think of any reason for them not other than not wanting DM53 L/55 at any faster RoF than 6 seconds
Upon a closer look it seems the F-35 could actually mount more missiles than the EFT with Sidekick upgrade. 6 inside the bay, and 3 on each wing? That’s a total of 12 BVR missiles
At which point, is it still a stealth aircraft?
Obviously not and probably have a flight model of a 5th gen F-18.
They probably want to keep the 3 TD at 12.0 and it’s performing statistically decently.
A full CR3 prototype is something they would likrly want as an end of the line MBT, which means it needs to be 12.7, which means it needs something to help it stand out.
And since this is Gaijin, they’ll just slap a 5 second reload on it and call it a day.
Ariete P also has a longer reload than the other Arietes, so they’ll probably use a reason that the CR3 prototype’s turret was better optimised to enable that reload, or something along those lines.
cant they take double racks on the wings?
I haven’t seen anything indicating that
they are in the picture you sent. that makes 16 total with sidekick
3 Likes
F-18 mode, subsonic lumber bus with no stealth
i mean if pure missile count is the question it wins. EFT would be the better launching platform though, just becuase of speed. i think it could still break mach at sea level though
1 Like
But if that was the case, then surely the F-15C GE & F-18E is better than the Typhoon?
please read what i wrote
Fixed, transferred “greater missile count” to F-35.
1 Like
Yes i am, and the devs, u said the devs where right about blowout panels, so you prove to me that u belive them. They said thats how they work in real life and i proved them and u wrong with showing u good evidence so i don’t know what ur talking abt
Yes? That was the whole argument from the beginning….
You said blowout panels work in the game. They don’t. That’s all there is to it. Saying “you’re just explaining real life” doesn’t magically make your original claim true.
Analyzing the graphs of all nations — the USA, Germany, the USSR, Britain, Japan, China, Italy, France, Sweden, and Israel — only one conclusion can be drawn: the Mi-28NM broke the game balance.
After it was added to the progression tree, all graphs except the USSR’s began to drop sharply.
The likely reason for this is that players’ priority targets were anti-aircraft systems, which at that time could not effectively compete with the Mi-28NM. This allowed Su-30 and Su-34 aircraft to destroy ground vehicles almost without punishment.
After more anti-aircraft systems were added for all nations in October, the graphs began to gradually stabilize. Most likely, this is because the USSR could no longer destroy all AA units in time, and they started intercepting significantly more Soviet aircraft.
There is reason to believe that these graphs will rise even further next month, as a large number of free anti-aircraft units have been introduced into the game.
3 Likes
Ok show me how much the blow can handle explosive tnt. Than we’ll see if a full apfsds ammo storage can blow up a tank.
Because what i am seeing you saying is ammo should not explod and instead just burn like a toy.
Maybe they should add flames doing damage to the crew. Feeling like a roasted turkey inside a abram must feel bad
I didn’t say a full apfsds ammo load would blow up the tank…
If u bring one heat round the game counts it as every round is heat. At the moment only the leopards blowout panel is bugged which it shouldn’t be.
No, that’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying ammo should still explode and burn, but blowout panels prevent the tank from instantly dying. Flames and crew damage are separate mechanics, but the game currently ignores the panel entirely .so yes, the tank just dies instantly, which is wrong. What you said just proves to me that you don’t know what your talking about, quit while your at it.
If you had switched the nations on these aircraft you would be saying the Germans are good players for doing ok in a not that great aircraft and dunking on US players for doing worse in the same plane as the Britis.
1 Like
And if the US aircraft was doing as well as the Rafale is, you would be saying its perfectly balanced
if a US plane was putting up rafale numbers it would be nerfed in a week anyways so there would be no need. nor do i think iv ever come on here and contradicted my own statement’s purely because of the nation involved
1 Like