Choose your engagements. Dont be stupid and just hold W
3 crew or 4 crew
Also a 20mm pen difference in negligible.
They practically have the same gun and all.
Should the T-80Ud be 10.7? Yes
Its 49mm flat pen difference or 28mm 60deg difference and I have explained before, 3bm42 can consistently pen the cheeks of a 2a4 and early abrams with a chance of penning the right cheek of an m1a1.
which i dont
air CAS turned up the difficulty in DEC due to the free AA
Now everyone with a BUK gets a free Pantsir
USA everyone gets free ADATS and those aren’t the best AA for average players. They’re a trap because they require skill.
Flying CAS went from oh I’ll take out a tank or two. To a dodge missiles minigame trying to locate AA who sees you through trees. All while your team is getting eaten by LMURs.
It is obvious that China wins due to other factors, for example because they have a strong CAS, or because they play mainly together with the USSR.
1 Like
Chinese players are just superior bro, you can go to their section then translate to english if you have trouble reading, they are just so much smarter than US mains bro
And that’s why the Chinese make fewer kill deads than the Americans?
Yeah, buff the player base.
Meanwhile Flakpanzer 37mm vs IS4 (M60 is even easier to kill with it). But you’re right - M48 and M60 are such food around that BR, especially the unstabilised ones. Only time I have time for an M60 type tank is when they start getting DM33 and such.
The Americans have decent kill-dead stats, but poor win rates.
Well, it turns out that American players play well.
games played has the same number of digits as the KD
They have already explained to me that this is not important.
And note that almost all US MBTs have excellent ground kill ratios. So it’s not a matter of skill.
Which would imply they are farming kills while ignoring objectives, it fairly common on the major nations, especially on ranks with premiums, I’m mean look at the K/D vs win rate for the tiger 2s.
But that is an issue with the players, not the tanks.
The main issues that DO need to be fixed on USA tanks are the too thin turret ring, the turret basket completely disabling traverse from the smallest piece of spall hitting it and the inability for the gunner to use emergency manual traverse when the hydraulics are destroyed.
I would also add normal armor to the gun mantlet.
Now let’s look at this Abrams. It has an almost 50% win rate, but its Kill Dead stats are significantly worse than the SEPV2’s. Do you know why? Because there’s no Su-30, no Pantsir, no LMUR. But the US has the A-10A Late, which has a strong CAS.
I think most MBTs are intentionally weak in that regard, the T-series being an exception due to the trunnion shape being a volumetric hell hole, but before it was added you would lose your gun breech to autocannon APDS in many of the T-s.
From reading the thread on the Abrams breech armour I don’t think adding it would make it OP though, maybe an extra 150 to 200mm of steel armour which would bring it up to ~400mm RHA equivalent at a guess.
2 Likes