It has drastically better stats. And. Is the same vehicle.
Because it’s a response to something you said.
You suggested no nations have a skill issue. When a player doesn’t know how to play a vehicle, its because of a lack of knowledge, or skill. Therefore, a skill issue. So what I’m saying here is that it is possible for players of every nation to have a skill issue, and that it just so happens that people who play the US a good bit of the time have a lack of skill. A.k.a. a skill issue.
They say lots of stuff, but at the end of the day, if people are going to buy them, they are going to add them. It’s a money printing machine.
The only thing that will reverse their decision to add high tier premiums is if people don’t buy them and or they finally punish the people who leave after 1 death(because we all know rewarding them hasn’t worked)
i think we should realistically let the hype around the tank settle a few months instead of using the stats of the tanks fastest grinders.
Man, you gotta look at the arietes. I remember them buffing the abrams reload time while ignoring a worst vehicle, which was hilarious.
The tech tree stats aren’t that much better ngl. Although the Challengers suffer worse in the WR department they somehow still do well in the K/D department. I feel like at some point German and USA players switched their playstyles near top tier where the German players become snipers with ears able to hear a bird fart in a bush 2km away and eyes capable of spotting a tick having a nap under a blade of grass over 3km away, and the US players became the blind deaf and dumb players who don’t see enemies directly in front of them drive past a BMP-2 firing a hailmary at their teammate and wonder into the crosshairs of an eagle eyed 2S38 player.
i dont think germany is a good example here the only tank they have at top tier with a better kd than the sep is the 2a7 and thats the objective best tank in the game.
The Chinese tank is new and few people play it. And if you watch the death spawn, the results are basically identical.
if abrams are so bad why china abrams has such good stats while having a worse shell?
cope
Typically doesn’t mean always.
Should I post the USA 7.0 or 8.3 lineups? Which are massively worse offenders over the bmpt.
Oh yeah I’ve seen good USA teams absolutely decimate the opposing team, but it’s rare, because for some reason people think the abrams is invincible like the leo2a7v
Your statement would make sense if China actually had a better K.D across the board at most brs all but when it come to the actual average Chinese player there’s no real gap between them and the US. check the stats again in 5 months when the average player gets to it.
lol please do so I can critique
Took me a second to realize y’all were talking about the T58. I was like what’s so damn special about the Sheridan? It’s ok at best
T58 is overpowered, greatly, but its one of a few american vehicles with this performance in that range he’s speaking on. USSR has a half dozen just at 10.3-10.7
ADD TURRET BASKETS FOR ALL TANKS OR DONT ADD THEM AT ALL. please, and yes i do agree with you.
cuz the tank just came out, give it a few months and we’ll see
Its not a skill issue, Abrams is really weak (mainly talking about the sepv2 compared to its competitors) you pretty much have to act like a m18 with no frontal armor.
The only vehicle I can think of thats OP in that range is the XM246 and T58. Otherwise US 7.0-8.3 is ok.
