Vehicle: T-72B3A
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 12.3 → 11.3-12.0
Reason: It has no advantages in performance compared to the T-72B3 (with the UBH modification), and the presence of APS does not provide improved protection against the most common hazard.
true, you could decompress toptier to br 18.0 with no problems.
yes, its not the best, but I accepted the bad airframe good missile tradeoff there.
True
ELC bis
GRB 6.0 —> 6.3
Along with the BR increase, I propose issuing an optical rangefinder in accordance with these reports:
VDM still going up :( at least it’s in air RB only.
Very surprised to see so many ground vehicles around 3.3-3.7 going up a step in BR. If we could have decompression instead of different compression that would be great.
Happy enough with PzIV going up to 4.0. I like the PzIV and it’s pretty good for 3.7 so it feels right. But i would like the H and J to be moved back to rank III with the BR increase.
Pvkv III Should get Slpprj m/49 as it can fire it (Bug report) and it would help defeat KV-1s then make it 4.0 / 4.3. Bam fast reload 57mm with 179mm pen. A complete side-grade to the Pvkv II. Then move the Pvkv IV to where the Pvkv III currently sits and change the Pvkv IV to a Tank destroyer.
Now we have a new good Line-up in the swedish TD Line
(Pvkv II should be 4.3 but you get the concept)
The AMX 50 (TO90/30) is fine where it is, instead the Souma should go 8.0.
But it is pointless arguing for Premium vehicles to go up before the sales as they have historically only done so after the sales
both bmpt o be moved up more than what is stated
so the prem bmpt to 12.0 where it will have a amazing line up to go with
and the tecktree bmpt to 12.3 since it is better than the prem one and more capable both will fit well at that br and still do as good as they are now
instead of moving the line a little rip the bandaid off and put them where they sould have been from the start
Imagine how much damage I do in an aircraft that’s simply better in every way (Su-30MKK/MK2)
The premium flanker absolutely needs to go up in br
The AMX 50 is not fine where it is.
It has 182 pen or something. It’s gun Is too weak for 8.0
ELC 901
GRB 6.0 —> 6.0 (Cancel BR change)
The ELC 901 is a worse version of the ELC bis. It has worse mobility, especially reverse. It also lacks smoke grenades.
Spitfire MK14e to get 150 Octane + 5.7 → 6.3
We have a lot of 5.7 and 6.7 spitfires in game.
mk24 is often bouncing between 6.7 and 7.0. It would be nice to see the mk14’s gain their historical 150 octane and fill a gap rather than maintaining the br congestion of 5.7 spitfires.
With the expected increase of the Mk 9 LF to 6.0 i think this would offer a nice spread of spitfires and br’s.
So what I’m seeing is that my opinion about a vehicle in air RB is pointless because I’m an air RB player?
A player who does really well, in air RB?
Ikv 103 should stay at It’s BR. BR was NOT the problem. Removing It’s HEAT-FS and making it to see the fast, small and fast-firing tanks will only make it worse.
Even at 1.0 it will perform same unless they fix the core problem-Extremely inconsistent HEAT with slow velocity and slow reload. Please, just leave it at 4.0 with HEAT-FS.
Both tanks are under 2.0 KDr. Which means they are good, not great.
The AMX 50 is preforming worse than the Somua, and is a rare battle pass vehicle. It absolutely needs to go back to 7.7
Somua 8.0 would be… something, certainly
Vehicle: British OQF 75mm armed vehicles
Change: Add M61 APHE - outstanding bug report here
Reason: The large reshuffling of the 2.7-4.0 is the perfect time to address the completely anemic performance of the British 6pdr and OQF 75mm by giving them their historical APHE ammunition.
Vehicle: British 6pdr armed vehicles
Change: Add M86 APHE - outstanding bug report here
Reason: The large reshuffling of the 2.7-4.0 is the perfect time to address the completely anemic performance of the British 6pdr and OQF 75mm by giving them their historical APHE ammunition.
Why on earth are we compressing the 3.7/4.0 BR upwards to fight even more KV series tanks? They have only just moved themselves and now we’re feeding them more Shermans and Pz IV’s with their new volumetric armour??
Why one of the most requested change-Not nerfing the A6M in general, didnt go through? I genuinely want to hear the reason from the developers.
First you need to use stats from the last month as total stats includes legacy data when it was a diffrent BR.
Edit: Char 25T is a good comparison to a TT vehicle.
