My Mig-15 have no problem intercepting the B52 or Tu-95M I have easily outclimbed them at 13,000M The MiG-15 has easily outclimbed the B52 even if they are doing side climbing.
We currently have absolutely no benefit on the bomber at all. So in your logic those fighter shall have more benefit?
1st How early are you talking about? Every early jet I played can climb higher then both of this bombers and even a few late propeller could do this. Lot of people can engage it with no problem at all so how come you have the problem???
Last month stats ARE NOT the way to dictate how a vehicle is preforming. Global is better as it takes in every month regardless of when it was a lower br. It’s a more accurate measurement.
Secondly, the Tiger II and T29 have higher kdr bro. Pick a lane
Rare vehicle = higher KDr.
TT = lower KDr.
It’s very simple.
Char is also smaller, quicker… etc
Also if we base br on your KDr placement system, instead of capability, then why is the E100 still 7.7?
When the E100 should be 8.0 or 8.3?
This Lvakan m/48 ammunition issue has been accepted for over two years now, can we get any update on its status?
The gun is still using incorrect L/60 - Lvakan 36 ammunition, as seen on the L-62 Anti-II, leading to significantly reduced performance against aircraft compared to its correct L/70 ammunition.
This isn’t an isolated case. Along with the ongoing autocannon muzzle flash issues, there’s growing frustration around long-standing, gameplay-impacting problems not being addressed. These issues directly affect usability. Especially for SPAA Sweden at 4.0 – 8.0, where SPAA performance is already lacking.
Except for the Ush 204 GK(among other vehicles with the same weaponry.) that instead suffers from an inability to deal with ground targets due to the inconsistant HVAP physics.
Could you clarify whether this is actively being thaught on, worked on, or if it’s currently considdered a non-issue entirely from the team?
1 Like
They are, as it shows how the vehicles performs in its current existing state.
all-time stats can be heavily affected by when it was a different br or in a different state
Last month:
All time:
3 Likes
Uh huh. Last month the E100 had nearly a 5.0 KDr.
Globally it’s 3.74~
What are you gonna say about that?
The factor of using “last month” is very inaccurate for several reasons:
- It doesn’t account for all uptiers /downtiers outside of that month
- It’s counting a small sample size instead of a larger one.
- Some vehicles can literally only be played by a few people over the span of a month.
- It generally doesn’t consider all players, just those who continue to player certain vehicles.
I guess you forgot about the poor 2.7 tanks
1 Like
It has a APHE-CBC with 57mm~ of pen. But they didnt say they were even adding that so its just a total loss for the poor tank!
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/xCzXf5PaZgtO
The reason:
4 Likes
Last month stats ARE NOT the way to dictate how a vehicle is preforming. Global is better as it takes in every month regardless of when it was a lower br. It’s a more accurate measurement.
Secondly, the Tiger II and T29 have higher kdr bro. Pick a lane
No need to be rude, and secondly im just going to flat out disagree and so would most people, how a vehicle is performing in the current meta is vastly more important then how it used to perform when it had a different BR (and the vehicle it self has changed i.e. autoloader has gone down to 4s)
Im not here to start doing what aboutism, the post you made was about the AMX so im not going to compare it to every vehicle that gets better stats in the game.
1 Like
yeah? It shows most recent performance, My statement does not change
2 Likes
Good low tier decrompression by moving most 3.3 and 3.7 up but T-28s need to move up as well.
They are absolutely busted in with their 76mm APHE launchers, high survivability and fast turret traverse. Particular the regular T-28 and T-28E.
Also amazing how the Yak-3 is finally moving up you refuse to move up the much more broken Yak-3U.
It outperforms other planes so much it’s not even funny.
La-7 is probably even stronger at 4.7 than the Yak-3 anyway and I still don’t see and reason to move up Zeros or the Fw 190 A-8, who are just one trick ponys that get outperformed by basically every other aircraft in most metrics.
In fact the A-8 is has hardly better in performance than the A-4 and 5 at 4.0/4.3.
Then compare them to the La-5FN, which also is a full BR lower than the La-7, despite being significantly slower in top speed and less manuverable. A much bigger difference than the A-4/A-5 compared to the A-8.
4 Likes
So you think the E100 is okay. But the French vehicle is OP…
Yeah okay sure… you’re firing on all cylinders clearly.
Vehicle: AEC Mk II
Change: Add M86 APHE - outstanding bug report here
Reason: The large reshuffling of the 2.7-4.0 is the perfect time to address the completely anemic performance of the British 6pdr and OQF 75mm by giving them their historical APHE ammunition.
13 Likes
Vehicle: Mirage 2000D-R1
Game Mode: Air RB
Change: 12.3 → 12.0
Reason:
The D-R1 suffers from inferior flight performance compared to fighter variants, and its air-to-air loadout is limited to only two Magic II missiles plus a gun pod. This significantly reduces its competitiveness against other aircraft at this BR.
4 Likes
Vehicle: Cromwell I
Change: Add M86 APHE - outstanding bug report here
Reason: The large reshuffling of the 2.7-4.0 is the perfect time to address the completely anemic performance of the British 6pdr and OQF 75mm by giving them their historical APHE ammunition.
14 Likes
Vehicle: Churchill III
Change: Add M86 APHE - outstanding bug report here
Reason: The large reshuffling of the 2.7-4.0 is the perfect time to address the completely anemic performance of the British 6pdr and OQF 75mm by giving them their historical APHE ammunition.
14 Likes
Vehicle: Mirage 2000D-RMV
Game Mode: Air RB
Change: 12.7 → 12.3
Reason:
The current 12.7 BR is mainly justified by the presence of AASM. However, with the separation of BRs between Air RB and Ground RB, this advantage becomes far less relevant in air combat.
In Air RB, the Mirage 2000D-RMV remains less effective in air-to-air combat, suffering from similar limitations as the D-R1. Although it features a helmet-mounted sight (HMD), its overall effectiveness is still inferior to lower-BR aircraft such as the Mirage 2000C. Additionally, the lack of MICA IR further limits its combat potential, making its current BR difficult to justify.
5 Likes
Vehicle: Valentine IX
Change: Add M86 APHE - outstanding bug report here
Reason: The large reshuffling of the 2.7-4.0 is the perfect time to address the completely anemic performance of the British 6pdr and OQF 75mm by giving them their historical APHE ammunition.
12 Likes