The AMX 50 is not fine where it is.
It has 182 pen or something. It’s gun Is too weak for 8.0
3 Likes
ELC 901
GRB 6.0 —> 6.0 (Cancel BR change)
The ELC 901 is a worse version of the ELC bis. It has worse mobility, especially reverse. It also lacks smoke grenades.
7 Likes
Spitfire MK14e to get 150 Octane + 5.7 → 6.3
We have a lot of 5.7 and 6.7 spitfires in game.
mk24 is often bouncing between 6.7 and 7.0. It would be nice to see the mk14’s gain their historical 150 octane and fill a gap rather than maintaining the br congestion of 5.7 spitfires.
With the expected increase of the Mk 9 LF to 6.0 i think this would offer a nice spread of spitfires and br’s.
3 Likes
So what I’m seeing is that my opinion about a vehicle in air RB is pointless because I’m an air RB player?
A player who does really well, in air RB?
2 Likes
Ikv 103 should stay at It’s BR. BR was NOT the problem. Removing It’s HEAT-FS and making it to see the fast, small and fast-firing tanks will only make it worse.
Even at 1.0 it will perform same unless they fix the core problem-Extremely inconsistent HEAT with slow velocity and slow reload. Please, just leave it at 4.0 with HEAT-FS.
8 Likes
Both tanks are under 2.0 KDr. Which means they are good, not great.
The AMX 50 is preforming worse than the Somua, and is a rare battle pass vehicle. It absolutely needs to go back to 7.7
Somua 8.0 would be… something, certainly
Vehicle: British OQF 75mm armed vehicles
Change: Add M61 APHE - outstanding bug report here
Reason: The large reshuffling of the 2.7-4.0 is the perfect time to address the completely anemic performance of the British 6pdr and OQF 75mm by giving them their historical APHE ammunition.
22 Likes
Vehicle: British 6pdr armed vehicles
Change: Add M86 APHE - outstanding bug report here
Reason: The large reshuffling of the 2.7-4.0 is the perfect time to address the completely anemic performance of the British 6pdr and OQF 75mm by giving them their historical APHE ammunition.
17 Likes
Why on earth are we compressing the 3.7/4.0 BR upwards to fight even more KV series tanks? They have only just moved themselves and now we’re feeding them more Shermans and Pz IV’s with their new volumetric armour??
1 Like
Why one of the most requested change-Not nerfing the A6M in general, didnt go through? I genuinely want to hear the reason from the developers.
First you need to use stats from the last month as total stats includes legacy data when it was a diffrent BR.
Yes I know French players are on average one of the best and generally do better in vehicles and that it is a older event based vehicle hence only experienced players use it, but you cant be serious asking for a vehicle that is getting 1.73 KD to go down in BR.
Edit: Char 25T is a good comparison to a TT vehicle.
1.61 KD, you just need to learn weak spots and flank to do well in these vehicles.
My Mig-15 have no problem intercepting the B52 or Tu-95M I have easily outclimbed them at 13,000M The MiG-15 has easily outclimbed the B52 even if they are doing side climbing.
We currently have absolutely no benefit on the bomber at all. So in your logic those fighter shall have more benefit?
1st How early are you talking about? Every early jet I played can climb higher then both of this bombers and even a few late propeller could do this. Lot of people can engage it with no problem at all so how come you have the problem???
Last month stats ARE NOT the way to dictate how a vehicle is preforming. Global is better as it takes in every month regardless of when it was a lower br. It’s a more accurate measurement.
Secondly, the Tiger II and T29 have higher kdr bro. Pick a lane
Rare vehicle = higher KDr.
TT = lower KDr.
It’s very simple.
Char is also smaller, quicker… etc
Also if we base br on your KDr placement system, instead of capability, then why is the E100 still 7.7?
When the E100 should be 8.0 or 8.3?
This Lvakan m/48 ammunition issue has been accepted for over two years now, can we get any update on its status?
The gun is still using incorrect L/60 - Lvakan 36 ammunition, as seen on the L-62 Anti-II, leading to significantly reduced performance against aircraft compared to its correct L/70 ammunition.
This isn’t an isolated case. Along with the ongoing autocannon muzzle flash issues, there’s growing frustration around long-standing, gameplay-impacting problems not being addressed. These issues directly affect usability. Especially for SPAA Sweden at 4.0 – 8.0, where SPAA performance is already lacking.
Except for the Ush 204 GK(among other vehicles with the same weaponry.) that instead suffers from an inability to deal with ground targets due to the inconsistant HVAP physics.
Could you clarify whether this is actively being thaught on, worked on, or if it’s currently considdered a non-issue entirely from the team?
2 Likes
They are, as it shows how the vehicles performs in its current existing state.
all-time stats can be heavily affected by when it was a different br or in a different state
Last month:
All time:
4 Likes
Uh huh. Last month the E100 had nearly a 5.0 KDr.
Globally it’s 3.74~
What are you gonna say about that?
The factor of using “last month” is very inaccurate for several reasons:
- It doesn’t account for all uptiers /downtiers outside of that month
- It’s counting a small sample size instead of a larger one.
- Some vehicles can literally only be played by a few people over the span of a month.
- It generally doesn’t consider all players, just those who continue to player certain vehicles.
I guess you forgot about the poor 2.7 tanks
1 Like