also the driver hatch area has high hardness armor plates
turret ring just happens to be 4 times thicker than on the nato equivalents 200mm vs 50mm
the Chinese tanks which are very similar to the Russian tanks also just get 40-100mm
or the lackluster performance of apds and hesh
but of-course russian bias dosent exist its all just illusion or coincidence
I think it’s funny how Razer tends to call others “fans of russian equipment” whilst going so hard out of his way to defend the bullshit that is going on, lmao.
That was a translation error/misidentification of the issue the person was talking about.
The files say it’s normal ammo.
@FurinaBestArchon
Funny how you post disinformation about everyone that criticizes Russian equipment.
Funny how you post disinformation about everyone that criticizes Russian equipment.
Back to your usual tactic, eh? First discredit the person you’re arguing with, if that doesn’t work, call them a Russian Fanboy, if that doesn’t work - don’t answer them.
@KnightoftheAbyss stated the ammunition not exploding is due to “wet racks”, take that up with him rather than saying “lol no” (trust me bro?).
the hull of the b is not the same, the bv uses a diferent layout
This is much better. They didn’t bother to properly model the driver hatch on the BVM which has a tendency to eat up shots like a black hole. Its damage model is much smaller than it should be.
no its actually the 80mm high hardness plate unless you hit the hatch at a zero angle
No no, the hatch’s damage model is non-existent, see:
Like, where the hell is it?
edit: lol I just noticed, none of the T-80s have a proper damage model on their hatch.
its not exactly the same but those high hardness plates are still there just a bit thinner
45mm vs 50mm for the main plate behind the composite
ohhh now i see its modeled has being below the main upper plate instead of above
but wouldn’t the correct modeling make breech shots even more difficult than they already are
Main flaw was, that it was old export version, that fought against most modern tanks and under full enemy superiority.
The same flaw is seen today …
that must come from either tass or the russian pravda (truth) because there is more than plenty of evidence even the latest Russian tanks explode because of the auto loader
Correct modelling would push it upwards and cause more spall overall, to illustrate this:
T-72B3
BVM
))))
The lack of a proper damage model casuses the optics to just eat up rounds fired at it (somtimes, but it’s still bullshit tho).
Game files says that carousels aren’t wet storage.
Game files > minor misstatement.
No one’s trying to discredit you.
It isn’t Russian bias obviously, Russian technology is best in za world nothing can compete!
Who remembers the IS-4M (if I recall) having a invisible armour plate in the turret, it wasn’t discovered until someone checked the actual model in the files. It was planted by a developer and was immediately fixed after the “exposing”.
Gaijin has done it before so I wouldn’t be surprised if they are artificially buffing the T-80BVM
i dont know i had plenty of instances were the fabric part under the gun just ate apfsds shells so dont even want to know what happens to spall
Thats quite some effort you guys put into it, I think you should also post this on the .ru forum to grab some more attention.
